On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:53:42PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:04 PM Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

Drop this patch and drop the line where the fwnode is assigned in
gpio-sim.c. Then probe the device and print the addresses of the
parent and child swnodes. See how they are the same and don't match
the swnode hierarchy we created. You can then apply this patch and see
how it becomes correct.

Thanks. I will give a spin.

Note, it seems I have to revert your older code first...

Okay, I have to postpone because simple revert doesn't work for me.
Can you clean up the next, please and I can use it starting from tomorrow?


$ git tag --contains 5065e08e4ef3
DONT-USE-next-20211105
next-20211101
next-20211102
next-20211103
next-20211104
next-20211105
next-20211106
next-20211108
next-20211109
next-20211110
next-20211111
next-20211112
next-20211115
next-20211116
next-20211117
next-20211118
next-20211123
next-20211124
next-20211125
next-20211126
next-20211129
next-20211130
next-20211201

None of this is in next, please use:
https://github.com/brgl/linux/tree/topic/gpio-sim-v12 if you want a
branch.

It the old version that prevents me to apply (my branches based on next).

I just thought you were going to simply apply these patches.

That's correct, but see above.

Anyway, I'm already switched tasks for today. Maybe I will have some time
later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko