Re: [PATCH for next v1 1/2] gpio: omap: Replace raw_spin_lock_irqsave with raw_spin_lock in omap_gpio_irq_handler()
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date: 2021-02-11 18:37:41
Also in:
lkml
On 08/02/2021 10:56, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
There is no need to use API with _irqsave in omap_gpio_irq_handler(), because it already be in a irq-disabled context. Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <redacted> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 15 ++++++--------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c index 41952bb..dc8bbf4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c@@ -560,8 +560,6 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) u32 enabled, isr, edge; unsigned int bit; struct gpio_bank *bank = gpiobank; - unsigned long wa_lock_flags; - unsigned long lock_flags; isr_reg = bank->base + bank->regs->irqstatus; if (WARN_ON(!isr_reg))@@ -572,7 +570,7 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) return IRQ_NONE; while (1) { - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, lock_flags); + raw_spin_lock(&bank->lock); enabled = omap_get_gpio_irqbank_mask(bank); isr = readl_relaxed(isr_reg) & enabled;@@ -586,7 +584,7 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) if (edge) omap_clear_gpio_irqbank(bank, edge); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, lock_flags); + raw_spin_unlock(&bank->lock); if (!isr) break;@@ -595,7 +593,7 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) bit = __ffs(isr); isr &= ~(BIT(bit)); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, lock_flags); + raw_spin_lock(&bank->lock); /* * Some chips can't respond to both rising and falling * at the same time. If this irq was requested with@@ -606,15 +604,14 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) if (bank->toggle_mask & (BIT(bit))) omap_toggle_gpio_edge_triggering(bank, bit); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, lock_flags); + raw_spin_unlock(&bank->lock); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); + raw_spin_lock(&bank->wa_lock); generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit)); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, - wa_lock_flags); + raw_spin_unlock(&bank->wa_lock); } } exit:
NACK. Who said that this is always hard IRQ handler? What about RT-kernel or boot with "threadirqs"? -- Best regards, grygorii