Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] UHS-I support for sh_mobile_sdhi
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2015-06-11 02:49:46
Also in:
linux-mmc, linux-sh
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:57:57AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 11:16 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:quoted
On 10 June 2015 at 01:21, Ben Hutchings [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This series adds support for UHS-I in sh_mobile_sdhi, partly implemented in tmio_mmc. This does not yet include tuning for SDR-104, but SDR-50 now works on the R8A7790 Lager board and another development board. The pfc block needs to be reconfigured from 3.3V to 1.8V signalling on the pins wired to the SD card. This is supported by adding separate functions for 1.8V signalling in sh-pfc ("sdhi0_1v8" etc.). I expect that several SH SoCs have this capability, but I only have the R8A7790 data sheet so I only implemented it for that one. Changes since v1: - Reword commit message for "mmc: tmio: Add UHS-I mode support" - Make sh_mobile_sdhi_start_signal_voltage_switch() succeed if asked to switch to 3.3V and the regulator or pinctrl or pinctrl state is missing - Drop change to mmcif clock on Lager - Correct original author for sdhi clock changes on Lager Changes since the RFC: - Replace the 'regulator' devices for signal voltage switching with pinctrl functions and states - Drop 'mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: Add actual clock rate support' as it's redundant - Use a switch statement in sh_mobile_sdhi_start_signal_voltage_switch() - Fix subject prefix for the DT changes Ben. Ben Hutchings (5): mmc: tmio: Add UHS-I mode support pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add set_mux operation to struct sh_pfc_function pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Add separate functions for SDHI 1.8V operation mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: Add UHS-I mode support ARM: shmobile: lager: Enable UHS-I SDR-50 Ian Molton (1): ARM: shmobile: lager: Set clock rates for SDHI arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 24 +++++++++++-- drivers/mmc/host/sh_mobile_sdhi.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h | 3 ++ drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++ drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c | 2 +- drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h | 1 + drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7790.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c | 4 +++ drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 10 +++++- 9 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4Hi Ben, I have looked at the mmc patches, those looks good to me. Regarding the pinctrl and ARM patches, I suppose these can be taken through their respective trees and I can take the mmc patches?The problem with that is that I think the device tree change will cause a regression if it's applied without the driver changes. I would much prefer if I could get the pinctrl and device tree changes acked by the respective maintainers to go through the MMC tree. (I should probably have said that up front.)
Hi Ben, I may be misunderstanding the above, if so I apologise, but I would strongly prefer to avoid an arrangement where the kernel and device tree blob (DTS/DTSI -> DTB) need to be upgrade in lock-step as this tends not to lead to a good experience for users. My preference would be to maintain backwards and forwards compatibility and if appropriate schedule removal of such compatibility.
quoted
BTW, I noticed that the pinctrl maintainer wasn't in the to-field, you may need to repost.I have the relevant _list_ (linux-gpio) in cc and thought that would be sufficient, but maybe not, so cc'ing this message.
Thanks. I have also CCed Laurent who has done extensive work on sh-pfc.