Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support
From: Stefan Roesch <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-30 20:18:54
Also in:
io-uring
On 12/29/21 6:17 PM, Al Viro wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:30:01PM -0800, Stefan Roesch wrote:quoted
+static int __io_setxattr_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, + const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe) +{ + struct io_xattr *ix = &req->xattr; + const char __user *name; + int ret; + + if (unlikely(req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_IOPOLL)) + return -EINVAL; + if (unlikely(sqe->ioprio)) + return -EINVAL; + if (unlikely(req->flags & REQ_F_FIXED_FILE)) + return -EBADF; + + ix->filename = NULL; + name = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr)); + ix->ctx.value = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr2)); + ix->ctx.kvalue = NULL; + ix->ctx.size = READ_ONCE(sqe->len); + ix->ctx.flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->xattr_flags); + + ix->ctx.kname = kmalloc(sizeof(*ix->ctx.kname), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ix->ctx.kname) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = setxattr_copy(name, &ix->ctx); + if (ret) { + kfree(ix->ctx.kname); + return ret; + } + + req->flags |= REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP; + return 0; +}OK, so you * allocate a buffer for xattr name * have setxattr_copy() copy the name in *and* memdup the contents * on failure, you have the buffer for xattr name freed and return an error. memdup'ed stuff is left for cleanup, presumably.quoted
+static int io_setxattr_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, + const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe) +{ + struct io_xattr *ix = &req->xattr; + const char __user *path; + int ret; + + ret = __io_setxattr_prep(req, sqe); + if (ret) + return ret; + + path = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr3)); + + ix->filename = getname_flags(path, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(ix->filename)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(ix->filename); + ix->filename = NULL; + } + + return ret; +}... and here you use it and bring the pathname in. Should the latter step fail, you restore ->filename to NULL and return an error. Could you explain what kind of magic could allow the caller to tell whether ix->ctx.kname needs to be freed on error? I don't see any way that could possibly work...
At the end of the function __io_setxattr_prep() we set the flag REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP. If the processing fails for some reason, the cleanup code in io_clean_op() gets called and the data structures get de-allocated. In case the request is processed successfully, the memory gets de-allocated in io_setxattr() and io_fsetxattr() with the helper function __io_setxattr_finish(). The helper function clears the flag REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP, so clean up is not necessary. This is the general pattern of cleanup in io-uring. I can certainly add a cleanup function, that is called in all 3 cases: - io_setxattr, - io_fsetxattr - io_clean_op