Re: make alloc_anon_inode more useful
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2021-03-10 08:38:19
Also in:
linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml, virtualization
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:45AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 04:53:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
this series first renames the existing alloc_anon_inode to alloc_anon_inode_sb to clearly mark it as requiring a superblock. It then adds a new alloc_anon_inode that works on the anon_inode file system super block, thus removing tons of boilerplate code. The few remainig callers of alloc_anon_inode_sb all use alloc_file_pseudo later, but might also be ripe for some cleanup.On a somewhat related note, could I get you to look at drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c? As far as I can tell, there's no need for fb_deferred_io_aops to exist. We could just set file->f_mapping->a_ops to NULL, and set_page_dirty() would do the exact same thing this code does (except it would get the return value correct).
But maybe that would make something else go wrong that distinguishes between page->mapping being NULL and page->mapping->a_ops->foo being NULL?
I can't find any place in the kernel that treats a NULL aops different from not having the method it is looking for.
Completely untested patch ...
the patch looks mostly good to me.
} -#ifdef CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO - if (info->fbdefio) - fb_deferred_io_open(info, inode, file); -#endif + file->f_mapping->a_ops = NULL;
But I'd also skip this. Drivers generally do not set aops, but if they do a funtion like this really should not override it. This will require an audit of the callers, though.