Re: [PATCH 08/43] drm/fbdev: Add fbdev-shmem
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2024-03-13 09:04:14
Also in:
dri-devel
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:19 AM Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:
Am 12.03.24 um 17:14 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:quoted
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 4:48 PM Thomas Zimmermann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add an fbdev emulation for SHMEM-based memory managers. The code is similar to fbdev-generic, but does not require an addition shadow buffer for mmap(). Fbdev-shmem operates directly on the buffer object's SHMEM pages. Fbdev's deferred-I/O mechanism updates the hardware state on write operations. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>Thanks for your patch!quoted
--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_shmem.c +static int drm_fbdev_shmem_helper_fb_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper, + struct drm_fb_helper_surface_size *sizes) +{ + struct drm_client_dev *client = &fb_helper->client; + struct drm_device *dev = fb_helper->dev; + struct drm_client_buffer *buffer; + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem; + struct drm_framebuffer *fb; + struct fb_info *info; + u32 format; + struct iosys_map map; + int ret; + + drm_dbg_kms(dev, "surface width(%d), height(%d) and bpp(%d)\n", + sizes->surface_width, sizes->surface_height, + sizes->surface_bpp); + + format = drm_mode_legacy_fb_format(sizes->surface_bpp, sizes->surface_depth);Oops, one more caller of the imprecise let's-guess-the-format-from-bpp-and-depth machinery to get rid of...Right, that has been discussed in another thread. I'll change this call to the drm_driver_() function.
You mean drm_driver_legacy_fb_format()? That has the same issues.
quoted
quoted
+ buffer = drm_client_framebuffer_create(client, sizes->surface_width, + sizes->surface_height, format);[...]quoted
+} +/** + * drm_fbdev_shmem_setup() - Setup fbdev emulation for GEM SHMEM helpers + * @dev: DRM device + * @preferred_bpp: Preferred bits per pixel for the device. + * 32 is used if this is zero. + * + * This function sets up fbdev emulation for GEM DMA drivers that support + * dumb buffers with a virtual address and that can be mmap'ed. + * drm_fbdev_shmem_setup() shall be called after the DRM driver registered + * the new DRM device with drm_dev_register(). + * + * Restore, hotplug events and teardown are all taken care of. Drivers that do + * suspend/resume need to call drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked() themselves. + * Simple drivers might use drm_mode_config_helper_suspend(). + * + * This function is safe to call even when there are no connectors present. + * Setup will be retried on the next hotplug event. + * + * The fbdev is destroyed by drm_dev_unregister(). + */ +void drm_fbdev_shmem_setup(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int preferred_bpp)As this is a completely new function, can we please get a preferred_format parameter instead?An understandable question. But as it is, the patchset has a trivial change in each driver. And the preferred_bpp parameter has the same meaning as the bpp value in the video= parameter. So it's ok-ish for now.
OK.
Using a format parameter here is really a much larger update and touches the internals of the fbdev emulation. I'm not even sure that we should have a parameter at all. Since in-kernel clients should behave like userspace clients, we could try to figure out the format from the driver's primary planes. That's a patchset of its own.
How do you figure out "the" format from the driver's primary plane?
Isn't that a list of formats (always including XR24) , so the driver
still needs to specify a preferred format?
A while ago, I had a look into replacing preferred_{depth,bpp} by
preferred_format, but I was held back by the inconsistencies in some
drivers (e.g. depth 24 vs. 32). Perhaps an incremental approach
(use preferred_format if available, else fall back to legacy
preferred_{depth,bpp} handling) would be more suitable?
FTR, my main use-case is letting fbdev emulation distinguish between
DRM_FORMAT_Rx and DRM_FORMAT_Cx, which share the values of depth
and bpp.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds