RE: [PATCH 02/30] backlight/gpio_backlight: Compare against struct fb_info.device

From
Ruhl, Michael J <hidden>
Date
2023-06-05 20:41:29
Also in
dri-devel, linux-omap, linux-sh, linux-staging
Reply to
Sam Ravnborg, 2023-06-05
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ravnborg <redacted>
Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 4:23 PM
To: Ruhl, Michael J <redacted>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>; <redacted>;
javierm@redhat.com; deller@gmx.de; geert+renesas@glider.be;
lee@kernel.org; daniel.thompson@linaro.org; jingoohan1@gmail.com; linux-
fbdev@vger.kernel.org; Rich Felker [off-list ref]; linux-
sh@vger.kernel.org; linux-staging@lists.linux.dev; dri-
devel@lists.freedesktop.org; John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-
berlin.de>; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/30] backlight/gpio_backlight: Compare against struct
fb_info.device

Hi Michael.
quoted
quoted
Fixes a bug in the backlight driver and prepares fbdev for making
struct fb_info.dev optional.
I only see a rename from fbdev  to dev...

Is there missing code?

Would  a fixes: be useful?

M
quoted
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static int gpio_backlight_check_fb(struct
backlight_device *bl,
{
	struct gpio_backlight *gbl = bl_get_data(bl);

-	return gbl->fbdev == NULL || gbl->fbdev == info->dev;
+	return !gbl->dev || gbl->dev == info->device;
}
The real change is here where info->dev is replaced by info->device.
Yeah, after a few patches, I was getting the idea that the name was the bug. 😊

Thanks,

M
Sam
Thread (96 messages) 96 messages, 8 authors, last reply 2023-06-12
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help