Re: [PATCH v14 05/10] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort driver
From: CK Hu <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-14 07:07:00
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi, Bo-Chen: On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 19:12 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek mt8195 SoC. It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes. The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device will never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so that both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets device data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be used to control the phy properties. This driver is based on an initial version by Jitao shi [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <redacted> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <redacted> ---
[snip]
+
+static int mtk_dp_train_flow(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp, u8
target_link_rate,
+ u8 target_lane_count)
+{
+ u8 lane_adjust[2] = {};
+ bool pass_tps1 = false;
+ bool pass_tps2_3 = false;
+ int train_retries;
+ int status_control;
+ int iteration_count;
+ int ret;
+ u8 prev_lane_adjust;
+
+ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_LINK_BW_SET,
target_link_rate);
+ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_LANE_COUNT_SET,
+ target_lane_count |
DP_LANE_COUNT_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN);
+
+ if (mtk_dp->train_info.sink_ssc)
+ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_DOWNSPREAD_CTRL,
+ DP_SPREAD_AMP_0_5);
+
+ train_retries = 0;
+ status_control = 0;
+ iteration_count = 1;
+ prev_lane_adjust = 0xFF;
+
+ mtk_dp_set_lanes(mtk_dp, target_lane_count / 2);
+ ret = mtk_dp_phy_configure(mtk_dp, target_link_rate,
target_lane_count);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ dev_dbg(mtk_dp->dev,
+ "Link train target_link_rate = 0x%x, target_lane_count
= 0x%x\n",
+ target_link_rate, target_lane_count);
+
+ do {
+ train_retries++;
+ if (!mtk_dp->train_info.cable_plugged_in)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (!pass_tps1) {
+ ret = mtk_dp_train_tps_1(mtk_dp,
target_lane_count,
+ &iteration_count,
lane_adjust,
+ &status_control,
+ &prev_lane_adjust);
+ if (!ret) {
+ pass_tps1 = true;
+ train_retries = 0;
+ } else if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = mtk_dp_train_tps_2_3(mtk_dp,
target_link_rate,
+ target_lane_count,
+ &iteration_count,
+ lane_adjust,
&status_control,
+ &prev_lane_adjust);
+ if (!ret) {
+ pass_tps2_3 = true;
+ break;
+ } else if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ drm_dp_dpcd_read(&mtk_dp->aux,
DP_ADJUST_REQUEST_LANE0_1,
+ lane_adjust, sizeof(lane_adjust));
+ mtk_dp_train_update_swing_pre(mtk_dp,
target_lane_count,
+ lane_adjust);
+ } while (train_retries < MTK_DP_TRAIN_RETRY_LIMIT &&
+ iteration_count < MTK_DP_TRAIN_MAX_ITERATIONS);train_retries and iteration_count are the same thing, so keep one and drop another one. Regards, CK
+ + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET, + DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_DISABLE); + mtk_dp_train_set_pattern(mtk_dp, 0); + + if (!pass_tps2_3) + return -ETIMEDOUT; + + mtk_dp->train_info.link_rate = target_link_rate; + mtk_dp->train_info.lane_count = target_lane_count; + + mtk_dp_training_set_scramble(mtk_dp, true); + + drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux, DP_LANE_COUNT_SET, + target_lane_count | + DP_LANE_COUNT_ENHANCED_FRAME_EN); + mtk_dp_set_enhanced_frame_mode(mtk_dp, true); + + return ret; +} +