Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 4 authors, 2022-07-01

Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort driver

From: Rex-BC Chen <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-01 05:18:22
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 13:34 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
Hi, Bo-Chen:

On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 16:03 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
quoted
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>

This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek
mt8195
SoC.

It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.

The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device
will
never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
that
both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
device
data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
used
to control the phy properties.

This driver is based on an initial version by
Jitao shi [off-list ref]

Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <redacted>
[Bo-Chen: Cleanup the drivers and modify comments from reviewers]
Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <redacted>
---
[snip]
quoted
+
+static void mtk_dp_power_enable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
+{
+	mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_RESET_AND_PROBE,
+			   0, SW_RST_B_PHYD);
+
+	/* Wait for power enable */
+	usleep_range(10, 200);
+
+	mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_RESET_AND_PROBE,
+			   SW_RST_B_PHYD, SW_RST_B_PHYD);
+	mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE,
+			   DP_PWR_STATE_BANDGAP_TPLL,
DP_PWR_STATE_MASK);
+}
+
+static void mtk_dp_power_disable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
+{
+	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE, 0);
+
+	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034,
+		     DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN |
+		     DA_CKM_BIAS_LPF_EN_FORCE_VAL |
+		     DA_CKM_BIAS_EN_FORCE_VAL |
+		     DA_XTP_GLB_LDO_EN_FORCE_VAL |
+		     DA_XTP_GLB_AVD10_ON_FORCE_VAL);
+
+	/* Disable RX */
+	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_1040, 0);
MTK_DP_1040 is set to 0 in mtk_dp_power_disable(), but it is not set
to
other value in mtk_dp_power_enable(). Does any thing would be wrong
when mtk_dp_power_disable() and mtk_dp_power_enable()?

Regards,
CK
Hello CK,

in mtk_dp_power_enable(),
after we reset the hw:
mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_RESET_AND_PROBE,
		   SW_RST_B_PHYD, SW_RST_B_PHYD);
mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE,
		   DP_PWR_STATE_BANDGAP_TPLL,
		   DP_PWR_STATE_MASK);

the value will be set back to default value 0x7.
I will add "mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_1040, 7);" to prevent
misunderstanding.

BRs,
Bo-Chen
quoted
+	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_MEM_PD,
+		     0x550 | BIT(FUSE_SEL_SHIFT) |
BIT(MEM_ISO_EN_SHIFT));
+}
+
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help