Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort driver
From: Rex-BC Chen <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-01 05:18:22
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 13:34 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
Hi, Bo-Chen: On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 16:03 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:quoted
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek mt8195 SoC. It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes. The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device will never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so that both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets device data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be used to control the phy properties. This driver is based on an initial version by Jitao shi [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <redacted> [Bo-Chen: Cleanup the drivers and modify comments from reviewers] Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <redacted> ---[snip]quoted
+ +static void mtk_dp_power_enable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp) +{ + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_RESET_AND_PROBE, + 0, SW_RST_B_PHYD); + + /* Wait for power enable */ + usleep_range(10, 200); + + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_RESET_AND_PROBE, + SW_RST_B_PHYD, SW_RST_B_PHYD); + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE, + DP_PWR_STATE_BANDGAP_TPLL, DP_PWR_STATE_MASK); +} + +static void mtk_dp_power_disable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp) +{ + mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE, 0); + + mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034, + DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN | + DA_CKM_BIAS_LPF_EN_FORCE_VAL | + DA_CKM_BIAS_EN_FORCE_VAL | + DA_XTP_GLB_LDO_EN_FORCE_VAL | + DA_XTP_GLB_AVD10_ON_FORCE_VAL); + + /* Disable RX */ + mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_1040, 0);MTK_DP_1040 is set to 0 in mtk_dp_power_disable(), but it is not set to other value in mtk_dp_power_enable(). Does any thing would be wrong when mtk_dp_power_disable() and mtk_dp_power_enable()? Regards, CK
Hello CK, in mtk_dp_power_enable(), after we reset the hw: mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_RESET_AND_PROBE, SW_RST_B_PHYD, SW_RST_B_PHYD); mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE, DP_PWR_STATE_BANDGAP_TPLL, DP_PWR_STATE_MASK); the value will be set back to default value 0x7. I will add "mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_1040, 7);" to prevent misunderstanding. BRs, Bo-Chen
quoted
+ mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_MEM_PD, + 0x550 | BIT(FUSE_SEL_SHIFT) | BIT(MEM_ISO_EN_SHIFT)); +} +