On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:24 PM Peilin Ye [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:49:46PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:

quoted

Peilin, can you pls resend this together with all the other pending
patches from you? I think that's better than me trying to cherry-pick the
bits we decided to keep from random places.

Oh, are we doing an -rc3 backmerge soon? At the moment I can base these
patches on neither drm-misc (due to the font_copy removal), nor mainline
(due to the signedness issue in font_desc we've talked about), so I'm
waiting for a backmerge to rebase everything properly. Sorry that I
didn't mention earlier.

linux-next has all the trees, so you can always use that. And yes I'm
pushing the backmerge through, so in a few days at most I can pull in
all your patches. Meanwhile you can base your work of linux-next.

quoted

Greg, ok if I just pull these in through drm-misc-next? It's a pretty bad
hairball anyway and that avoids the tree coordination issues. Only thing
that might get in the way is the vt font_copy removal, but that's in -rc3
so easy to backmerge.

I will rebase and send everything (including the font_copy
garbage-collecting) in a v3 series after the backmerge. Thanks,

No need to be blocked on a backmerge, this is only needed for merging
the patches. Development should not be blocked like this.
-Daniel

Peilin Ye

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch