On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

quoted

Hello Lee,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.

... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
otherwise there's no point in taking it.

Right.

I'm happy to wait for Thierry.  Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking.  Is he okay?  On holiday perhaps?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog