[PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

Subsystems: backlight class/subsystem, framebuffer layer, the rest

STALE2311d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)

1 review trailer.

8 messages, 4 authors, 2020-04-15 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Guru Das Srinagesh <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-20 01:41:43

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index efb4efc..3e5dbcf 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c

@@ -625,7 +625,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		pb->scale = data->max_brightness;
 	}
 
-	pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (state.period / pb->scale);
+	pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (div_u64(state.period,
+				pb->scale));
 
 	props.type = BACKLIGHT_RAW;
 	props.max_brightness = data->max_brightness;

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-20 13:30:43

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

quoted hunk

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index efb4efc..3e5dbcf 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c

@@ -625,7 +625,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		pb->scale = data->max_brightness;
 	}
 
-	pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (state.period / pb->scale);
+	pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (div_u64(state.period,
+				pb->scale));
 
 	props.type = BACKLIGHT_RAW;
 	props.max_brightness = data->max_brightness;

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-24 11:06:25

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index efb4efc..3e5dbcf 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c

@@ -625,7 +625,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		pb->scale = data->max_brightness;
 	}
 
-	pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (state.period / pb->scale);
+	pb->lth_brightness = data->lth_brightness * (div_u64(state.period,
+				pb->scale));
 
 	props.type = BACKLIGHT_RAW;
 	props.max_brightness = data->max_brightness;

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-24 12:57:48

Hello Lee,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Daniel Thompson <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-24 13:04:18

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

Hello Lee,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.

... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
otherwise there's no point in taking it.


Daniel.

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-24 14:23:58

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

quoted

Hello Lee,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.

... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
otherwise there's no point in taking it.

Right.

I'm happy to wait for Thierry.  Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking.  Is he okay?  On holiday perhaps?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-24 14:43:18

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 02:24:41PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

quoted

Hello Lee,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.

... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
otherwise there's no point in taking it.

Right.

I'm happy to wait for Thierry.  Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking.  Is he okay?  On holiday perhaps?

The newest commit by him in next is from last week. My guess is he
just didn't come around yet to care for the PWM duties.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2020-04-15 09:25:47

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 02:24:41PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

quoted

Hello Lee,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:

quoted

Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
dividend instead of a straight division operation.

Cc: Lee Jones <redacted>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Can this patch be taken on its own?

Hellooooo ...

Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.

... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
otherwise there's no point in taking it.

Right.

I'm happy to wait for Thierry.  Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking.  Is he okay?  On holiday perhaps?

The newest commit by him in next is from last week. My guess is he
just didn't come around yet to care for the PWM duties.

Looks like we missed the last release.

Let's hope we don't miss the next one also.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help