Re: [Xen-devel] RIP MTRR - status update for upcoming v4.2
From: Jan Beulich <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-15 06:20:24
Also in:
linux-media, linux-pci, lkml
From: Jan Beulich <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-15 06:20:24
Also in:
linux-media, linux-pci, lkml
quoted
quoted
On 13.06.15 at 01:15, [off-list ref] wrote:On Jun 12, 2015 12:59 AM, "Jan Beulich" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
On 12.06.15 at 01:23, [off-list ref] wrote:There are two usages on MTRRs: 1) MTRR entries set by firmware 2) MTRR entries set by OS drivers We can obsolete 2), but we have no control over 1). As UEFI firmwares also set this up, this usage will continue to stay. So, we should not get rid of the MTRR code that looks up the MTRR entries, while we have no need to modify them. Such MTRR entries provide safe guard to /dev/mem, which allows privileged user to access a range that may require UC mapping while the /dev/mem driver blindly maps it with WB. MTRRs converts WB to UC in such a case.But it wouldn't be impossible to simply read the MTRRs upon boot, store the information, disable MTRRs, and correctly use PAT to achieve the same effect (i.e. the "blindly maps" part of course would need fixing).This may crash and burn badly when we call a UEFI function or an SMI happens. I think we should just leave the MTRRs alone.
I buy the SMI part, but UEFI runtime calls are being done on page tables we construct and control, so attributes could be kept correct without relying on MTRRs. Jan