Re: [Xen-devel] RIP MTRR - status update for upcoming v4.2

From
Jan Beulich <hidden>
Date
2015-06-12 07:59:58
Also in
linux-media, linux-pci, lkml
Reply to
Toshi Kani, 2015-06-11
quoted
quoted
On 12.06.15 at 01:23, [off-list ref] wrote:
There are two usages on MTRRs:
 1) MTRR entries set by firmware
 2) MTRR entries set by OS drivers

We can obsolete 2), but we have no control over 1).  As UEFI firmwares
also set this up, this usage will continue to stay.  So, we should not
get rid of the MTRR code that looks up the MTRR entries, while we have
no need to modify them.

Such MTRR entries provide safe guard to /dev/mem, which allows
privileged user to access a range that may require UC mapping while
the /dev/mem driver blindly maps it with WB.  MTRRs converts WB to UC in
such a case.
But it wouldn't be impossible to simply read the MTRRs upon boot,
store the information, disable MTRRs, and correctly use PAT to
achieve the same effect (i.e. the "blindly maps" part of course
would need fixing).
UEFI memory table has memory attribute, which describes cache types
supported in physical memory ranges.  However, this information gets
lost when it it is converted to e820 table.
I'm afraid you rather don't want to trust that information, as
firmware vendors frequently screw it up.

Jan
Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 7 authors, last reply 2015-08-07
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help