Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 5 authors, 2013-02-08

Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] fb: udlfb: fix hang at disconnect

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2013-02-04 03:22:55
Also in: lkml, stable

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:35:42PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Am 29.01.2013 16:51, schrieb Alexander Holler:
quoted
Am 29.01.2013 12:11, schrieb Alexander Holler:
quoted
To explain the problem on shutdown a bit further, I think the following
happens (usb and driver are statically linked and started by the kernel):

shutdown -> kill signal -> usb stack shuts down -> udlfb waits (forever)
for a kill or an urb which it doesn't get.
Having a second look at what I've written above, I'm not even sure if
the kernel sends one or more fatal signals on shutdown at all. I've just
assumed it because otherwise down_interruptible() wouldn't have worked
before (it would have stalled on shutdown too (if an urb got missed),
not only on disconnect).

Sounds like an interesting question I should read about (if/when fatal
signals are issued by the kernel). ;)
quoted
Maybe the sequence is different if the usb-stack and udlfb are used as a
module and/or udlfb is used only for X/fb. I'm not sure what actually
does shut down the usb-stack in such a case, but maybe more than one
kill signal might be thrown around.
If anyone still follows my monologue: The question was interesting
enough that I couldn't resist for long. ;)

(all pasted => format broken)

In drivers/tty/sysrq.c there is

------
static void send_sig_all(int sig)
{
        struct task_struct *p;

        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
        for_each_process(p) {
                if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
                        continue;
                if (is_global_init(p))
                        continue;

                do_send_sig_info(sig, SEND_SIG_FORCED, p, true);
        }
        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}

static void sysrq_handle_term(int key)
{
        send_sig_all(SIGTERM);
        console_loglevel = 8;
}

(...)

static void sysrq_handle_kill(int key)
{
        send_sig_all(SIGKILL);
        console_loglevel = 8;
}
------

Now I've done some learning by doing (kernel 3.7.5 + some patches):

------
diff --git a/drivers/video/udlfb.c b/drivers/video/udlfb.c
index df249f3..db8a86c 100644
--- a/drivers/video/udlfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/udlfb.c
@@ -1876,14 +1876,18 @@ static void dlfb_free_urb_list(struct dlfb_data
*dev)
        unsigned long flags;

        pr_notice("Freeing all render urbs\n");
+       if (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
+               pr_info("AHO: I'm a kernel thread\n");

        /* keep waiting and freeing, until we've got 'em all */
        while (count--) {

                /* Timeout likely occurs at disconnect (resulting in a
leak) */
                ret = down_timeout_killable(&dev->urbs.limit_sem,
FREE_URB_TIMEOUT);
-               if (ret)
+               if (ret) {
+                       pr_info("AHO: ret %d\n", ret);
                        break;
+               }

                spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->urbs.lock, flags);
------

Now I've disconnected the display. And, as send_sig_all() already
suggests, the result was (besides discovering an oops in
call_timer_fn.isra (once)):

------
[  120.963010] udlfb: AHO: I'm a kernel thread
[  122.957024] udlfb: AHO: ret -62
------
(-62 is -ETIME)

So, if the above down_timeout_killable() is only
down_interruptible(), as in kernel 3.7.5, the  box would not
shutdown afterwards, because on shutdown no signal would be send to
that kernel-thread which called dlfb_free_urb_list().

A last note: dlfb_usb_disconnect() (thus dlfb_free_urb_list()) isn't
called on shutdown if the device would still be connected. So the
problem only might happen, if the screen will be disconnected before
shutdown (and an urb gets missed). So the subject of my patch is
correct. ;)
Yes, we don't disconnect all devices from the USB bus on shutdown
because, I think, we didn't tear down all of the PCI devices originally,
so your USB bus never knew it was going to be shutdown.

This is how things have always worked, and shutting down PCI devices in
the past have been known to cause problems.  I think.  I vaguely
remember some issues when I tried to do this 10+ years or so ago in the
2.5 kernel days, but I could be totally wrong given that I can't
remember what I was working on last month at times...

So you are right in that your driver will wait for forever for a
disconnect() to happen, as it will never be called.  I don't understand
the problem that this is causing when it happens.  What's wrong with
udlfb that having the cpu suddently reset as the powerdown happened
without it knowing about it?

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help