On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi all,
Changes since 20130117:
Undropped tree: samung
The powerpc tree still had a build failure.
The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
fix patch.
The gpio-lw tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130117.
The samsung tree lost the majority of its conflicts but gained more
against the arm-soc and slave-dma tree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From my dmesg diff-file:
+[ 288.730849] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
+[ 294.050498] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.04 seconds) done.
+[ 294.097024] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
+[ 314.098849] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks
refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
+[ 314.098862] jbd2/loop0-8 D ffffffff8180d780 0 297 2 0x00000000
+[ 314.098865] ffff880117ec5b68 0000000000000046 ffff880117ec5b08
ffffffff81044c29
+[ 314.098868] ffff88011829dc80 ffff880117ec5fd8 ffff880117ec5fd8
ffff880117ec5fd8
+[ 314.098871] ffff880119b34560 ffff88011829dc80 ffff880117ec5b68
ffff88011fad4738
+[ 314.098873] Call Trace:
+[ 314.098881] [<ffffffff81044c29>] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
+[ 314.098885] [<ffffffff811c63e0>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
+[ 314.098888] [<ffffffff816b4b59>] schedule+0x29/0x70
+[ 314.098890] [<ffffffff816b4c2f>] io_schedule+0x8f/0xd0
+[ 314.098892] [<ffffffff811c63ee>] sleep_on_buffer+0xe/0x20
+[ 314.098896] [<ffffffff816b342f>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
+[ 314.098898] [<ffffffff811c5aa1>] ? submit_bh+0x121/0x1e0
+[ 314.098900] [<ffffffff811c63e0>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
+[ 314.098903] [<ffffffff816b34dc>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x7c/0x90
+[ 314.098906] [<ffffffff8107eb00>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40
+[ 314.098909] [<ffffffff811c63de>] __wait_on_buffer+0x2e/0x30
+[ 314.098913] [<ffffffff8128a6a1>]
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x1791/0x1960
+[ 314.098917] [<ffffffff8109269d>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xbd/0x110
+[ 314.098920] [<ffffffff8107eac0>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
+[ 314.098923] [<ffffffff81069fbf>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x4f/0x70
+[ 314.098925] [<ffffffff8128e4e8>] kjournald2+0xb8/0x240
+[ 314.098927] [<ffffffff8107eac0>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
+[ 314.098929] [<ffffffff8128e430>] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10
+[ 314.098931] [<ffffffff8107ded0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
+[ 314.098933] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
+[ 314.098936] [<ffffffff816be52c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
+[ 314.098938] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
+[ 314.098969]
+[ 314.098970] Restarting kernel threads ... done.
+[ 314.099052] Restarting tasks ... done.
Please, have a lot at it.
This is a freezer failure while freezing kernel threads, so I don't think it's
related to ACPI or PM directly.
Does it happen on every suspend?
No, I only did one S/R.
I have built a 2nd new kernel where I pulled-in latest pm.git#linux-next.
With this kernel two S/Rs were fine - but that says not much.
After several S/Rs on the "buggy" -1 kernel I know see in my syslogs:
Jan 18 23:50:02 fambox kernel: [ 141.853828] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
Jan 18 23:50:02 fambox kernel: [ 141.956943] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
Jan 18 23:50:02 fambox kernel: [ 141.957438] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Jan 18 23:50:02 fambox kernel: [ 141.957454] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02
Jan 18 23:50:02 fambox kernel: [ 142.060830] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
Jan 18 23:50:02 fambox kernel: [ 142.164639] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
Are you worried about the "local_softirq_pending" messages?
That's the only new messages I have seen after several S/Rs.
They are kind of unusual.
Anyway, they seem to be related to CPU hotplug (CPU offline), so you can try
if you can trigger them through the sysfs CPU offline/online interface.
Can you explain that a bit clearer or give some sample lines for testing?
There is a sysfs file
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online
(where X=0,1,2,3,...) for each CPU core in the system. The value read from it
indicates whether or not the given core is online (1 means online). Writing 0
to it means that the given core should be put offline. Writing 1 means to put
it back online. You can simply write first 0s and than 1s to those files
for CPUs > 0 multiple times in a row and see if that triggers messages like the
above. If it does, that may mean there's been a change in kernel/cpu.c, for
example, that causes it to appear. The change may have been made somewhere in
arch/x86 too, though.
quoted
quoted
quoted
If you have a testcase for me to reproduce it here, I would be happy.
Do you mean the freezer-related issue?
Any one as I am still stepping in the dark.
I checked my disc-space as I built a lot of software today and run
once out of space.
But 1.7GiB should be enough on / for testing.
I wanted to run the new LTP version I built the last days.
Let's see what I get...
Stress-testing the freezer is rather easy and doesn't require disk space.
All it takes is to echo "freezer" to /sys/power/pm_test and then do
"echo mem > /sys/power/state && sleep 1" in a loop. This is described in
Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt IIRC.
[ CCing TTY and FBDEV folks ]
[ TESTCASE ]
kernel-config: CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y
root# echo "freezer" > /sys/power/pm_test
root# echo mem > /sys/power/state && sleep 1
This produces several TTY call-traces...
+[ 810.417180] ------------[ cut here ]------------
+[ 810.417203] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:475
flush_to_ldisc+0x12f/0x1f0()
+[ 810.417207] Hardware name: 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH
+[ 810.417210] tty is NULL
+[ 791.200932] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
+[ 810.417213] Modules linked in: bnep rfcomm parport_pc ppdev
snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek coretemp kvm_intel kvm arc4
iwldvm ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel snd_hda_intel mac80211 xts
uvcvideo snd_hda_codec aes_x86_64 lrw snd_hwdep gf128mul
videobuf2_vmalloc joydev ablk_helper snd_pcm i915 videobuf2_memops
cryptd videobuf2_core snd_page_alloc videodev snd_seq_midi
snd_seq_midi_event iwlwifi snd_rawmidi snd_seq i2c_algo_bit snd_timer
drm_kms_helper psmouse snd_seq_device drm btusb microcode cfg80211 snd
bluetooth serio_raw soundcore lpc_ich samsung_laptop wmi mei mac_hid
video lp parport hid_generic r8169 usbhid hid
+[ 810.417307] Pid: 37, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted
3.8.0-rc4-next20130118-3-iniza-generic #1
+[ 810.417310] Call Trace:
+[ 810.417325] [<ffffffff81058acf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
+[ 810.417332] [<ffffffff81058bc6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
+[ 810.417340] [<ffffffff8141b03f>] flush_to_ldisc+0x12f/0x1f0
+[ 810.417349] [<ffffffff81077d95>] process_one_work+0x155/0x460
+[ 810.417357] [<ffffffff81078a38>] worker_thread+0x168/0x410
+[ 810.417364] [<ffffffff810788d0>] ? manage_workers+0x2c0/0x2c0
+[ 810.417371] [<ffffffff8107ded0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
+[ 810.417377] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
+[ 810.417385] [<ffffffff816beaec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
+[ 810.417427] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
+[ 810.417438] ---[ end trace a302c76f044b14c2 ]---
...and my first reported call-trace is also seen afterwards...
+[ 811.192835] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks
refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
+[ 811.192957] jbd2/loop0-8 D ffffffff8180d780 0 289 2 0x00000000
+[ 811.192966] ffff880118115b68 0000000000000046 ffff880118761720
0000000000000001
+[ 811.192974] ffff880118761720 ffff880118115fd8 ffff880118115fd8
ffff880118115fd8
+[ 811.192981] ffffffff81c15440 ffff880118761720 ffff880118115b68
ffff88011fa14738
+[ 811.192988] Call Trace:
+[ 811.193006] [<ffffffff811c6830>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
+[ 811.193015] [<ffffffff816b5149>] schedule+0x29/0x70
+[ 811.193021] [<ffffffff816b521f>] io_schedule+0x8f/0xd0
+[ 811.193028] [<ffffffff811c683e>] sleep_on_buffer+0xe/0x20
+[ 811.193037] [<ffffffff816b3a1f>] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90
+[ 811.193044] [<ffffffff811c5ef1>] ? submit_bh+0x121/0x1e0
+[ 811.193051] [<ffffffff811c6830>] ? __wait_on_buffer+0x30/0x30
+[ 811.193058] [<ffffffff816b3acc>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x7c/0x90
+[ 811.193067] [<ffffffff8107eb00>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40
+[ 811.193073] [<ffffffff811c682e>] __wait_on_buffer+0x2e/0x30
+[ 811.193085] [<ffffffff8128aaf1>]
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x1791/0x1960
+[ 811.193093] [<ffffffff816b62de>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2e/0x40
+[ 811.193102] [<ffffffff81069fbf>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x4f/0x70
+[ 811.193109] [<ffffffff8128e938>] kjournald2+0xb8/0x240
+[ 811.193115] [<ffffffff8107eac0>] ? add_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
+[ 811.193120] [<ffffffff8128e880>] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10
+[ 811.193126] [<ffffffff8107ded0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
+[ 811.193132] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
+[ 811.193139] [<ffffffff816beaec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
+[ 811.193144] [<ffffffff8107de10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0
+[ 811.193228]
+[ 811.193231] Restarting kernel threads ... done.
+[ 811.193403] Restarting tasks ... done.
Thanks Rafael for the hints and your patience!
Hope TTY/FBDEV folks can help.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
I have tested with some patches on top of Linux-Next (next-20130118),
see attached patches file!
This looks like a typo to me...
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
unsigned long flags;
struct tty_ldisc *disc;
- tty = port->itty;
+ tty = port->tty;
if (WARN_RATELIMIT(tty = NULL, "tty is NULL\n"))
return;
[ CCing Ilya Zykov ]
This was not a good idea :-)!
Sounds like I am hitting what the patch "tty: Correct tty buffer
flush." from Ilya is trying to fix.
Unfortunately, his patch needs to be refreshed against latest tty-next!
I will try it when it is ready.
- Sedat -
[1] http://marc.info/?t5452868300003&r=1&w=2
- Sedat -
quoted
- Sedat -
quoted
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.