Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]

Started by Sedat Dilek on Jan 19, 2013 · 2 messages from 1 author · Last reply Jan 19, 2013

open the first message on its own page

Sedat Dilek

Message details and related content
Open message details and related content
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Changes since 20130117:

Undropped tree: samung

The powerpc tree still had a build failure.

The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
fix patch.

The gpio-lw tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130117.

The samsung tree lost the majority of its conflicts but gained more
against the arm-soc and slave-dma tree.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From my dmesg diff-file:

+[  288.730849] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
+[  294.050498] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.04 seconds) done.
+[  294.097024] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
+[  314.098849] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks
refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
+[  314.098862] jbd2/loop0-8    D ffffffff8180d780     0   297      2 0x00000000
+[  314.098865]  ffff880117ec5b68 0000000000000046 ffff880117ec5b08
ffffffff81044c29

187 more quoted lines

This looks like a typo to me...

--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
        unsigned long   flags;
        struct tty_ldisc *disc;

-       tty = port->itty;
+       tty = port->tty;
        if (WARN_RATELIMIT(tty = NULL, "tty is NULL\n"))
                return;

- Sedat -

- Sedat -
quoted
Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

Sedat Dilek replied to Sedat Dilek

Message details and related content
Open message details and related content
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:41:11 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:28:55 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:56:53 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Friday, January 18, 2013 11:11:07 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Changes since 20130117:

Undropped tree: samung

The powerpc tree still had a build failure.

The driver-core tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge
fix patch.

The gpio-lw tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130117.

The samsung tree lost the majority of its conflicts but gained more
against the arm-soc and slave-dma tree.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From my dmesg diff-file:

+[  288.730849] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
+[  294.050498] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.04 seconds) done.
+[  294.097024] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
+[  314.098849] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks
refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
+[  314.098862] jbd2/loop0-8    D ffffffff8180d780     0   297      2 0x00000000
+[  314.098865]  ffff880117ec5b68 0000000000000046 ffff880117ec5b08

202 more quoted lines

[ CCing Ilya Zykov ]

This was not a good idea :-)!

Sounds like I am hitting what the patch "tty: Correct tty buffer
flush." from Ilya is trying to fix.
Unfortunately, his patch needs to be refreshed against latest tty-next!
I will try it when it is ready.

- Sedat -

[1] http://marc.info/?t5452868300003&r=1&w=2

- Sedat -
quoted
- Sedat -
quoted
Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help