Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 2 authors, 2012-12-19

Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAPDSS: DISPC: Move DISPC specific dss_reg_fields to dispc_features

From: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-30 10:14:54
Also in: linux-omap

On Thursday 29 November 2012 05:35 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2012-11-28 12:41, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
quoted
The register fields in dss_reg_fields specific to DISPC are moved from struct
omap_dss_features to corresponding dispc_reg_fields, initialized in struct
dispc_features, thereby enabling local access.

Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c        |   87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h          |    4 ++
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss_features.c |   28 ----------
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss_features.h |    7 ---
 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
index 9f259ba..21fc522 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
@@ -80,6 +80,16 @@ struct dispc_irq_stats {
 	unsigned irqs[32];
 };
 
+enum dispc_feat_reg_field {
+	FEAT_REG_FIRHINC,
+	FEAT_REG_FIRVINC,
+	FEAT_REG_FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD,
+	FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD,
+	FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE,
+	FEAT_REG_HORIZONTALACCU,
+	FEAT_REG_VERTICALACCU,
+};
+
 struct dispc_features {
 	u8 sw_start;
 	u8 fp_start;
@@ -107,6 +117,8 @@ struct dispc_features {
 
 	u32 buffer_size_unit;
 	u32 burst_size_unit;
+
+	struct register_field *reg_fields;
 };
 
 #define DISPC_MAX_NR_FIFOS 5
@@ -1150,7 +1162,8 @@ static void dispc_init_fifos(void)
 
 	unit = dispc.feat->buffer_size_unit;
 
-	dss_feat_get_reg_field(FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE, &start, &end);
+	start = dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE].start;
+	end = dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOSIZE].end;
 
 	for (fifo = 0; fifo < dispc.feat->num_fifos; ++fifo) {
 		size = REG_GET(DISPC_OVL_FIFO_SIZE_STATUS(fifo), start, end);
@@ -1214,8 +1227,10 @@ void dispc_ovl_set_fifo_threshold(enum omap_plane plane, u32 low, u32 high)
 	low /= unit;
 	high /= unit;
 
-	dss_feat_get_reg_field(FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD, &hi_start, &hi_end);
-	dss_feat_get_reg_field(FEAT_REG_FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD, &lo_start, &lo_end);
+	hi_start = dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD].start;
+	hi_end = dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD].end;
+	lo_start = dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD].start;
+	lo_end = dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOLOWTHRESHOLD].end;
I think these are quite verbose. Perhaps a helper function which does
the same as dss_feat_get_reg_field() would be better. Or alternatively,
maybe something like:

const struct dss_reg_field *hi_field > &dispc.feat->reg_fields[FEAT_REG_FIFOHIGHTHRESHOLD];

and then use "hi_field.start" instead of hi_start.

Or something else that makes the above easier to read.
OK.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
index 84a7f6a..aa273d8 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.h
@@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ struct reg_field {
 	u8 low;
 };
 
+struct register_field {
+	u8 start, end;
+};
+
We already have the dss_reg_field struct. I think it's better to move
that to dss.h, and use it, instead of creating an exact duplicate.

 Tomi
register_field appears to be a more generic a name rather than
dss_reg_field. Also I was thinking to initialise

struct dispc_reg_fields {
	struct register_field firhinc;
	struct register_field firvinc;
	struct register_field fifo_low_threshold;
	...
};
 similarly, dss_reg_fields and dsi_reg_fields from register_field.

-- 
Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
Texas Instruments India Pvt. Ltd.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help