Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2012-09-22

Re: [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2012-09-20 15:57:06
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c, linux-media, linux-mmc, linux-watchdog

On Thursday 20 September 2012, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:39:34AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
The first five branches are scheduled to go through the arm-soc tree, so
I'm fine with that. For the sound/for-3.7 branch, I'd like to know when
to expect that hitting mainline. If it always gets in very early during the
merge window, it's probably ok to put the imx/multi-platform patches into
the same branch as the other ones in arm-soc and wait for the sound stuff
to hit mainline first, otherwise I'd suggest we start a second
next/multiplatform-2 branch for imx and send the first part early on
but then wait with the second batch before sound gets in.
It seems that we will have to go with next/multiplatform-2.  I just
tried to merge the series with linux-next together, and got some
non-trivial conflicts with media and mtd tree.  I might have to rebase
my series on top of these trees to sort out those conflicts.  That said,
I will have several dependencies outside arm-soc tree, and have to pend
my series until all those trees get merged into mainline.
Ok, fair enough. I think we can put it in arm-soc/for-next as a staging
branch anyway to give it some exposure to linux-next, and then we can
decide whether a rebase is necessary before sending it to Linus.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help