On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:52:15PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 07:41:50AM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

It's usually pretty early but Takashi will be on holiday this time so
I'm not sure if things might be different (he was going to send the pull
request from holiday).  I also didn't guarantee that it'll be stable
yet, can someone please tell me what the depenency is here?

We need the patch to have all imx drivers mach/* inclusion free,
so that we can enable multi-platform support for imx, which is the
whole point of the series.

That doesn't answer the question.  What is the dependency - what is it
about this patch that something else depends on?  Your cover letters
just say you'd like to do this but don't mention dependencies at all and
when I asked the question last night you said the same thing.  I've not
seen the rest of the series...

If your for-3.7 is not stable anyway, I guess the easiest the way

It probably *is* stable but I'm not enthused about people pulling
unsigned tags.  I might rebase, though - I'm going to finalise the tree
in the next few days.

to do it might be you drop the patch "ASoC: mx27vis: retrieve gpio
numbers from platform_data" from your tree and I have it be part of
the series to go via arm-soc tree as a whole.  (This is the original
plan that I mentioned in v1 cover letter)

You just mentioned it as a preference (you said it's something you'd
like to do), please if you're doing this sort of cross tree thing be
explicit about what the inter-tree relationships are.  If things need to
go in via the same tree say so explicitly (and ideally say way this is).

The main reason I applied it straight away was that Javier mentioned
that it was a bug fix and it's near the merge window and these random
ARM cleanup serieses never seem to go in quickly.