On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 23:12 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:47:32 +1200
Tony Prisk [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk <redacted>
---
drivers/tty/serial/vt8500_serial.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Can we have a comment attached to a change this size. In particular one
describing why it gone from 4 to 6 ports, and why the port id twiddling.
Is there a reason you can't use the device tree port id ?
What are the regression risks for existing users expecting the pdev->id
binding ?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Sorry Alan,
The original patch was very simple, but I revisited it to fix other
issues and forgot to add the relevant comments.
Port size is changed to fix a problem - WM8505 actually had 6 uart's
defined in platform data but the vt8500_ports variable was only 4.
I have added devicetree port id support as well.
No regression risks as the entire platform is being converted to
devicetree and existing code dropped in this patchset.
Patchv4 3/9 to follow.
Regards
Tony Prisk