Re: Device tree binding for DVFS table

On 20120712-09:47, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:

On Wednesday 11 July 2012 08:14 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:03:41AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

I'd expect a single property with freq/volt pairs or 2 properties for
freq and voltage where there is a 1:1 relationship (freq N uses voltage N).

I strongly agree - the current proposal is very hard to read due to the
separation between the voltage and frequency values.  Some devices do
also need to scale multiple rails together, especially when this gets
used for I/O devices.

Multiple rails for single clock or would it be multiple clocks?

Voltage rails do not correspond to clocks.  They correspond to the IP
block in question (e.g. the "module" or "device" that consumes clocks
and voltage).

Regards,
Mike