Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:44:29AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On 07/27/2012 07:05 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:

quoted

quoted

+		power-on-sequence {
+			regulator@0 {
+				id = "power";
+				enable;

quoted

What do this mean? Isn't this implied for a regulator?

I assume you might have some sequences which need some things to be
turned off for some reason; it at least seems to be something you'd want
to design for.

Furthermore there is the power-off-sequence equivalent, which you use
for instance when you turn off the panel. Typically they would do the
inverse of the power-on-sequence, so turning off a regulator is
definitiely required.

Thierry