Thread (91 messages) 91 messages, 3 authors, 2011-12-13

Re: [PATCH 35/65] OMAPDSS: APPLY: move spinlock outside the struct

From: Archit Taneja <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-23 09:37:16
Also in: linux-omap

On Tuesday 22 November 2011 02:51 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
dss_cache struct contains a spinlock used to protect the struct. A more
logical place for the spinlock is outside the struct that it is
protecting. So move it there.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen<redacted>
---
  drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c |   22 ++++++++++++----------
  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
index 23c723a..17639c0 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/apply.c
@@ -89,13 +89,15 @@ struct mgr_priv_data {
  };

  static struct {
-	spinlock_t lock;
  	struct ovl_priv_data ovl_priv_data_array[MAX_DSS_OVERLAYS];
  	struct mgr_priv_data mgr_priv_data_array[MAX_DSS_MANAGERS];

  	bool irq_enabled;
  } dss_cache;

+/* protects dss_cache */
+static spinlock_t data_lock;
Minor comment: The name 'data_lock' doesn't tell much that its 
protecting the dss_cache struct. Probably 'cache_lock' or 
'priv_data_lock' or something like that may be more informative.

Archit
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
  static struct ovl_priv_data *get_ovl_priv(struct omap_overlay *ovl)
  {
  	return&dss_cache.ovl_priv_data_array[ovl->id];
@@ -108,7 +110,7 @@ static struct mgr_priv_data *get_mgr_priv(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)

  void dss_apply_init(void)
  {
-	spin_lock_init(&dss_cache.lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&data_lock);
  }

  static bool ovl_manual_update(struct omap_overlay *ovl)
@@ -149,10 +151,10 @@ int dss_mgr_wait_for_go(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)
  		unsigned long flags;
  		bool shadow_dirty, dirty;

-		spin_lock_irqsave(&dss_cache.lock, flags);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&data_lock, flags);
  		dirty = mp->dirty;
  		shadow_dirty = mp->shadow_dirty;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dss_cache.lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data_lock, flags);

  		if (!dirty&&  !shadow_dirty) {
  			r = 0;
@@ -212,10 +214,10 @@ int dss_mgr_wait_for_go_ovl(struct omap_overlay *ovl)
  		unsigned long flags;
  		bool shadow_dirty, dirty;

-		spin_lock_irqsave(&dss_cache.lock, flags);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&data_lock, flags);
  		dirty = op->dirty;
  		shadow_dirty = op->shadow_dirty;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dss_cache.lock, flags);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data_lock, flags);

  		if (!dirty&&  !shadow_dirty) {
  			r = 0;
@@ -464,7 +466,7 @@ static void dss_apply_irq_handler(void *data, u32 mask)
  	for (i = 0; i<  num_mgrs; i++)
  		mgr_busy[i] = dispc_mgr_go_busy(i);

-	spin_lock(&dss_cache.lock);
+	spin_lock(&data_lock);

  	for (i = 0; i<  num_ovls; ++i) {
  		ovl = omap_dss_get_overlay(i);
@@ -498,7 +500,7 @@ static void dss_apply_irq_handler(void *data, u32 mask)
  	dss_unregister_vsync_isr();

  end:
-	spin_unlock(&dss_cache.lock);
+	spin_unlock(&data_lock);
  }

  static int omap_dss_mgr_apply_ovl(struct omap_overlay *ovl)
@@ -620,7 +622,7 @@ int omap_dss_mgr_apply(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)
  	if (r)
  		return r;

-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dss_cache.lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&data_lock, flags);

  	/* Configure overlays */
  	list_for_each_entry(ovl,&mgr->overlays, list)
@@ -641,7 +643,7 @@ int omap_dss_mgr_apply(struct omap_overlay_manager *mgr)
  		dss_write_regs();
  	}

-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dss_cache.lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data_lock, flags);

  	dispc_runtime_put();
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help