Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 4 authors, 2011-06-21

Re: [PATCH 2/2] video: omap2: Compile omap2 support only when

From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-21 05:25:00
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, lkml

On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 10:18 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
Hi,

On Monday 20 June 2011 06:36 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 16:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
quoted
Currently display support for omap2 is selected by default and
it gets built for all the configurations.

Instead of it being a built-in feature, it's compilation should
depend on the config option CONFIG_FB_OMAP2.
No, I don't think so. omap2 directory contains vram, vrfb and omapdss,
all of which can be used without omapfb driver. vram and vrfb can be
even used without omapdss driver.
Even if I build the kernel with i386_defconfig, I get some compiled 
files within drivers/video/omap2.

$ make ARCH=x86 i386_defconfig O=out_dir
$ make ARCH=x86 O=out_dir

$ ls out_dir/drivers/video/omap2
built-in.o  displays  modules.builtin  modules.order

IMHO, drivers/video/omap2/ should not be compiled if the kernel is not 
built for omap2.
Ok. Yes, that's a known "problem". We could have a OMAPx check there,
but then again, the driver is a driver for the DSS HW, which could, at
least in theory, used in other SoCs.

I don't think any driver should normally depend on ARCH_something or
MACH_something.

I think this is more of a "problem" with the build system. The same
thing can be seen with, for example, drivers/video/backlight/ and
drivers/video/display/ directories. In practice the created files do not
affect the kernel in any way, as far as I see.

 Tomi

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help