Re: [Patch, RFC] Make struct fb_info ref-counted with kref
From: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>
Date: 2010-09-19 16:47:27
Also in:
lkml
Hi, Bruno Prémont schrieb:
For USB-attached (or other hot-(un)pluggable) framebuffers the current fbdev infrastructure is not very helpful. Each such driver currently needs to perform the ref-counting on its own in .fbops.fb_open and .fbops.fb_release callbacks.
I agree. This is a great idea even for non-hot-(un)pluggable framebuffers.
This patch moves the ref-counting in fbdev infrastructure. (drivers have not been adjusted, all those releasing fb_info in .fbops.fb_destroy will not work -- patch for those will follow later on, all the others will continue to work fine) API-wise the following changes are done: - num_registered_fb and registered_fb variables are no more exported. New functions fb_get_registered() and fb_is_registered() replace them. The only know user of those was fbcon, thus the large diff on fbcon.c Note: the accesses to registered_fb and num_registered_fb look racy as there was not protection at all around them, potentially letting register_framebuffer() register two framebuffers on the same minor concurrently, fbcon access should have been safe by combination of its use of console_semaphore and reaction to events. In this patch I combined most of fbcon's accesses to registered_fb and num_registered_fb into fb_is_registered(), though I'm not sure if the num-check optimization is worth to keep or its check should be put into a separate function. - framebuffer_release() is mapped to fb_put() but will go away when converting drivers Reference count for fb_info can be increased with fb_get(fb_info) and later released with fb_put(fb_info). If you have concerns regarding the API changes, please let me know.
Uhm, I'm not really happy with what we count. With the old method you mentioned we ref-counted framebuffer users, after your patch it's more counting users + uses. This might be okay as we usually are interested whether the ref_count is 0 or not but it doesn't look right if we modify the refcount during nearly every framebuffer operation. Wouldn't it be sufficient to do the refcounting in fb_open & fb_release operation + in fbcon where open&release are done?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c index 0a08f13..be5f342 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbsysfs.c@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct fb_info *framebuffer_alloc(size_t size, struct device *dev) info->par = p + fb_info_size; info->device = dev; + kref_init(&info->refcount);
As far as I know there exist framebuffer drivers which do not call framebuffer_alloc but contain their own fb_info. I guess these would be broken as well. Thanks, Florian Tobias Schandinat