Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2010-07-12

Re: Deadlock between fbcon and fb_defio?

From: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Date: 2010-05-10 06:00:53
Also in: lkml

Hi Jaya,

On Mon, 10 May 2010 08:00:51 Jaya Kumar wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Bruno Prémont
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Fix crash if we are the first framebuffer loaded as in that case
fbcon wants to flush framebuffer at the end of fb registration,
before we have setup fb_defio.
Bruno,

Please help me understand, how does this scenario occur? I'm
interpreting what you've written above to mean that fbcon is accessing
the framebuffer before you've called defio_init()? Is that correct?
That was the original state as I called defio_init after
register_framebuffer() and defio_cleanup() before
unregister_framebuffer(), the opposite to the typical sequence you
detail below. Fixed by the patch.

My deadlock issue, after applying the patch, is during set_par() when I
replace the framebuffer and wish defio to start using the new page(s)
instead of the old one(s).

I want to make sure that I won't be accessing the old framebuffer after
freeing it and also that defio monitors the new framebuffer.

For that reason I defio_cleanup(), replace framebuffer, defio_init().
All of this happens while do_fb_ioctl() holds lock on fb_info and
console_sem.

Thanks,
Bruno
The typical defio use sequence is: defio_init(),
register_framebuffer() and the typical remove sequence is in the
reverse order unregister_framebuffer(), defio_cleanup(). So, I don't
see how fbcon is accessing the framebuffer either before
register_framebuffer() completes (at which point defio init is already
done) or after unregister_framebuffer() completes.

Thanks,
jaya
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help