Re: [PATCH] Add VirtIO Frame Buffer Support
From: Avi Kivity <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-03 15:58:00
Also in:
kvm, qemu-devel
From: Avi Kivity <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-03 15:58:00
Also in:
kvm, qemu-devel
On 11/03/2009 05:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:quoted
On 11/03/2009 10:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:quoted
Exactly. In fact, I'm even scared to reboot mine because I might end up in a 3270 terminal. The whole text only crap keeps people from using this platform! And that's what I want to change here.Ok. I oppose paravirtualization for its own sake and only support it if there's no other way to get performance. In this case it buys us basic functionality which is surprisingly missing on native, that's arguably even more important.There is no "native" on s390. Everything is "paravirtual".
I meant native as in "what they usually do without our stuff". -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function