Re: [PATCH 2/4 v8] i.MX31: Image Processing Unit DMA and IRQ drivers
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-23 13:12:30
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
Well no miracle is taking place (And I have checked, the kernel I am running is the correct one according to the build date tag with uname). For me the initcalls are: c0019390 <__initcall_misc_init4>: c0019394 <__initcall_ipu_init4>: c0019398 <__initcall_proto_init4>: (Not exactly the same addresses as before because I add some pr_debug calls for debug). But none of them are called. And all of them are subsys_initcall. Do I have to enable something in my configuration so that these initcall actually get called ?
Let's say, this is the first time that I run into a situation when some initcalls do not get called, and I never bothered setting any special config variable for that, and it would surprise me a _lot_ if such a variable existed... What kernel version is this?
However, they all have the same "look" so to say: no real ARM assembly instruction but only addresses as Russel pointed it before:quoted
c0019390 <__initcall_misc_init4>: c0019390: c001349c .word 0xc001349c c0019394 <__initcall_ipu_init4>: c0019394: c0014258 .word 0xc0014258 c0019398 <__initcall_proto_init4>: c0019398: c00143e4 .word 0xc00143e4This may be the reason why these initcall are not actually called: Guennadi's ones had a real ARM assembly instruction.
No, they are just addresses.
To solve all my problems I need to understand why my subsys_initcall do not get called.
Good luck... Try the same with older kernels - even without ipu, just your regular kernel, maybe bisect since when your initcalls do not get called? Or compare to some running kernel's configuration... Cheers Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword