Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 4 authors, 2008-04-23

Re: deprecating fix->mmio_start and smem_start

From: Scott D. Davilla <hidden>
Date: 2008-04-22 18:29:17

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Scott D. Davilla wrote:
quoted
 >On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
 >>  We currently have a problem with those two members of struct
 >>  fb_fix_screeninfo. The struct contains an "unsigned long" which means
 >>  that:
 >>
 >>  - 64 bits kernels with 32 bits userspace can't pass a complete address
 >>  - 32 bits machines with 64 bits resource_size_t can't pass a complete
 >>  address
 >>  - The structure isn't even properly padded to be 32/64 bits neutral in
 >>  the first place.
 >>
 >  > We could define new versions of the struct with new get/set ioctls,
 >>  or we could try to just deprecate those fields. What do you guys think ?
 >
 >As userspace doesn't really need those fields[1], we can easily
 >deprecate them.
 > kexec uses FBIOGET_FSCREENINFO and FBIOGET_VSCREENINFO. So if these
 > ioctls changes, it will possibly break kexec under vesafb and efifb.

Does kexec use the smem_start and mmio_start fields of
fb_fix_screeninfo?
In "kexec/arch/i386/x86-linux-setup.c", the routine 
"setup_linux_vesafb" uses smem_start, smem_len, and line_length.

This is used for vesafb and efifb framebuffer kernel boot param 
setup. This is required for PC hardware that do not contain a PC-BIOS 
and need the bootloader to setup the kernel video boot params.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help