Re: fb_imageblit semantic
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2003-03-17 12:42:14
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
On 17 Mar 03 at 13:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
That depends... How do we draw the monochrome penguin? Using image->depth is 1 or 8? The latter (current method) is slower, since we need to expand the monochrome logo to 8-bit first, and (usually) compress it to 1-bit in the fbdev driver afterwards.As far as I can see, it gets monochromatic logo and converts it to 8bpp format ;-) (fb_set_logo, needs_logo = 1 or ~1) And then imageblit converts it back to 1bpp.
Yes, that's what I wrote above (current method).
quoted
And perhaps we may want to draw 32-bit ARGB images later? So I see the following possible valid values for image->depth: - 8 (logo with up to 256 colors and LUT) - optional 1 (monochrome logo, if we don't want to expand?) - optional 32 (ARGB image, dithering left to the driver?)I still do not understand 'if we don't want to expand'. This forces too much knowledge on upper layer, as far as I can tell.
Color expansion => use fb_image.fg_color if bit == 1,
use fb_image.bg_color if bit == 0
No expansion => look up color in fb_image.cmap.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en