On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 20:33:19 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes [off-list ref] wrote:

I am basing this on the mm-new branch in Andrew's tree, so let me know if I
should rebase anything here. Given the mm bits touched I did think perhaps
we should take it through the mm tree, however it may be more sensible to
take it through an fs tree - let me know!

It's more fs/ than mm/ purely from a footprint point of view.  But is
there any expectation that there will be additional patches which build
on this?

I'll scoop it into mm-new for now, see what happens.

Minus all the cc's.  Sorry ;)