From: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>
We do a bforget and return for no journal case, so let's remove this
conflict comment.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>
---
Change from RFC: add Jan's Reviewed-by.
fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
index be799040a415..6e224b19eae7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c
@@ -244,9 +244,6 @@ int __ext4_journal_get_write_access(const char *where, unsigned int line,
* "bh" may be NULL: a metadata block may have been freed from memory
* but there may still be a record of it in the journal, and that record
* still needs to be revoked.
- *
- * If the handle isn't valid we're not journaling, but we still need to
- * call into ext4_journal_revoke() to put the buffer head.
*/
int __ext4_forget(const char *where, unsigned int line, handle_t *handle,
int is_metadata, struct inode *inode,
--
2.25.1