Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 7 authors, 2021-03-20

Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-02-11 14:30:02
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Thu 11-02-21 13:25:33, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 02:07:03PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
quoted
On Thu 11-02-21 12:57:17, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
quoted
quoted
current->flags should be always manipulated from the user context. But
who knows maybe there is a bug and some interrupt handler is calling it.
This should be easy to catch no?
Why would it matter if it were?
I was thinking about a clobbered state because updates to ->flags are
not atomic because this shouldn't ever be updated concurrently. So maybe
a racing interrupt could corrupt the flags state?
I don't think that's possible.  Same-CPU races between interrupt and
process context are simpler because the CPU always observes its own writes
in order and the interrupt handler completes "between" two instructions.
I have to confess I haven't really thought the scenario through. My idea
was to simply add a simple check for an irq context into ->flags setting
routine because this should never be done in the first place. Not only
for scope gfp flags but any other PF_ flags IIRC.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help