Re: possible deadlock in start_this_handle (2)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-02-11 14:30:02
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-02-11 14:30:02
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu 11-02-21 13:25:33, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 02:07:03PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
On Thu 11-02-21 12:57:17, Matthew Wilcox wrote:quoted
quoted
current->flags should be always manipulated from the user context. But who knows maybe there is a bug and some interrupt handler is calling it. This should be easy to catch no?Why would it matter if it were?I was thinking about a clobbered state because updates to ->flags are not atomic because this shouldn't ever be updated concurrently. So maybe a racing interrupt could corrupt the flags state?I don't think that's possible. Same-CPU races between interrupt and process context are simpler because the CPU always observes its own writes in order and the interrupt handler completes "between" two instructions.
I have to confess I haven't really thought the scenario through. My idea was to simply add a simple check for an irq context into ->flags setting routine because this should never be done in the first place. Not only for scope gfp flags but any other PF_ flags IIRC. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs