Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64

[PATCH] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> · 2018-01-30
Re: [PATCH] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Trond Myklebust <hidden> · 2018-01-30
Re: [PATCH] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> · 2018-01-30
[PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> · 2018-01-30
Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2018-01-30
Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> · 2018-01-31
Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2018-01-31
Re: [PATCH v2] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64 · Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> · 2018-01-31

From: Linus Torvalds <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-30 20:53:35
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-integrity, linux-nfs, linux-xfs, lkml

Ack. Should I expect this in a future pull request, or take it directly?

There's no hurry about this, since none of the existing users of that
function actually do anything but test the return value against zero,
and nobody saves it into anything but a "bool" (which has magical
casting properties and does not lose upper bits).

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help