Re: [PATCH 03/12] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available
From: Dave Chinner <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-24 20:21:13
Also in:
linux-cifs, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:54:57PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
The defined bits in st_ioc_flags are the usual FS_xxx_FL, plus some extra
flags that might be supplied by the filesystem. Note that Ext4 returns
flags outside of {EXT4,FS}_FL_USER_VISIBLE in response to FS_IOC_GETFLAGS.
Should {EXT4,FS}_FL_USER_VISIBLE be extended to cover them? Or should the
extra flags be suppressed?Quite frankly, we should not expose flags owned by a filesystem like this. Create a new set of flagsi that are exposed by the syscall, and every filesystem is responsible for translating their internal flag values to the syscall flag values....
The defined bits in the st_information field give local system data on a file, how it is accessed, where it is and what it does: STATX_INFO_ENCRYPTED File is encrypted STATX_INFO_TEMPORARY File is temporary (NTFS/CIFS/deleted) STATX_INFO_FABRICATED File was made up by filesystem STATX_INFO_KERNEL_API File is kernel API (eg: procfs/sysfs) STATX_INFO_REMOTE File is remote STATX_INFO_OFFLINE File is offline (CIFS) STATX_INFO_AUTOMOUNT Dir is automount trigger STATX_INFO_AUTODIR Dir provides unlisted automounts STATX_INFO_NONSYSTEM_OWNERSHIP File has non-system ownership details STATX_INFO_REPARSE_POINT File is reparse point (NTFS/CIFS)
STATX_INFO_XATTR File/dir has extended attrs ... just like these STATX_INFO flags are filesystem independent... And, FWIW, I'd like to see more than one local filesystem supported in the initial patchset (e.g. btrfs) and also have all their inode/fs flags exposed so we don't end up encoding weird ext4-specific feature quirks into the API..... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org