Re: [PATCH 01/12] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding
From: Theodore Ts'o <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-29 02:46:05
Also in:
linux-cifs, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
From: Theodore Ts'o <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-29 02:46:05
Also in:
linux-cifs, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:10:53PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2015 14:36:46 Theodore Ts'o wrote:quoted
This is the patch I would prefer to use (and in fact which I have added to the ext4 tree): There are issues with 32-bit vs 64-bit encoding of times before January 1, 1970, which are handled with this patch which is not handled with what you have in your patch series. So I'd prefer if you drop this patch, and I'll get this sent to Linus as a bug fix for 4.4.I'm happy with either one. Apparently both Davids have arrived with almost the same algorithm and implementation, with the exception of the pre-1970 handling you mention there.
I was doing some testing on x86, which leads me to ask --- what's the current thinking about post y2038 on 32-bit platforms such as x86? I see that there was some talk about using struct timespec64, but we haven't made the transition in the VFS interfaces yet, despite a comment in an LWN article from 2014 stating that "the first steps have been taken; hopefully the rest will follow before too long". Cheers, - Ted