Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 6 authors, 2014-12-02

Re: [PATCH-v4 2/7] vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2014-11-28 05:36:56
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 06:00:16PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Well.... it's not quite enough.  The problem is that for ext3 and
ext4, the actual work of writing the inode happens in dirty_inode(),
not in write_inode().  Which means we need to do something like this.

I'm not entirely sure whether or not this is too ugly to live;
personally, I think my hack of handling this in update_time() might be
preferable....
.... and this doesn't work because it breaks ext3/ext4's transaction
handling, since the writeback thread could be racing against some
transactional update of the inode.  So I don't see a way of making the
queue_io / move_expired_inodes approach to the 24 hour time being
tractable.

So the alternatives that I can see at this point is either give up on
the 24 hour timeout, or we fall back to handling this in
update_time().

					- Ted

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help