Ext3: Mount partition as read only if during orphan cleanup truncate fails to obtain journal handle.

Started by Ashish Sangwan on Oct 24, 2012 · 4 messages from 3 authors · Last reply Oct 29, 2012

Subsystems (2)

Maintainers (3)

STALE5129d

open the first message on its own page

Message details and related content
During orphan cleanup while doing truncate, if we fail to obtain journal
handle, the inode for which truncate was called would not be removed from
both the on-disk and in-memory orphan lists as the call to ext3_orphan_del
would not be executed.

This would have following consequences:
a) As the inode is not removed from the on-disk list, truncate would be
called again for the same inode. Each call would add the inode to the
in-memory list. This operation would continue endlessly or until truncate
is succeed.

b) If somehow, after some iterations, truncate is succeed, ext3_orphan_del
will only remove the inode from in-memory list just 1 time. This will trigger
j_assert during put super.

This patch handles both the problems. If truncate fails, first in-memory
list is cleared and than the partition is mounted as read only.
Failure to obtain journal handle during mount may suggest that journal
device is corrupted.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <redacted>
---
 fs/ext3/super.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index bd60e08..798cd6f 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -1540,7 +1540,22 @@ static void ext3_orphan_cleanup (struct super_block * sb,
 			jbd_debug(2, "truncating inode %lu to %Ld bytes\n",
 				  inode->i_ino, inode->i_size);
 			ext3_truncate(inode);
-			nr_truncates++;
+			if (list_empty(&EXT3_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+				nr_truncates++;
+			} else {
+				/* Remove inode from in-memory orphan list */
+				list_del_init(&EXT3_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+				ext3_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "Truncate failed for "
+                                        "orphan  inode = %lu. Running e2fsck"
+                                        " is recommended", inode->i_ino);
+				if (!(s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
+					ext3_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "FS would be"
+						" mounted as readonly");
+					s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
+				}
+				break;
+			}
+
 		} else {
 			printk(KERN_DEBUG
 				"%s: deleting unreferenced inode %lu\n",
-- 
1.7.11.4
Message details and related content
Add Cc in mail loop.

Thanks.

2012/10/24, Ashish Sangwan [off-list ref]:
quoted hunk
During orphan cleanup while doing truncate, if we fail to obtain journal
handle, the inode for which truncate was called would not be removed from
both the on-disk and in-memory orphan lists as the call to ext3_orphan_del
would not be executed.

This would have following consequences:
a) As the inode is not removed from the on-disk list, truncate would be
called again for the same inode. Each call would add the inode to the
in-memory list. This operation would continue endlessly or until truncate
is succeed.

b) If somehow, after some iterations, truncate is succeed, ext3_orphan_del
will only remove the inode from in-memory list just 1 time. This will
trigger
j_assert during put super.

This patch handles both the problems. If truncate fails, first in-memory
list is cleared and than the partition is mounted as read only.
Failure to obtain journal handle during mount may suggest that journal
device is corrupted.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <redacted>
---
 fs/ext3/super.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index bd60e08..798cd6f 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -1540,7 +1540,22 @@ static void ext3_orphan_cleanup (struct super_block *
sb,
 			jbd_debug(2, "truncating inode %lu to %Ld bytes\n",
 				  inode->i_ino, inode->i_size);
 			ext3_truncate(inode);
-			nr_truncates++;
+			if (list_empty(&EXT3_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+				nr_truncates++;
+			} else {

21 more quoted lines

Message details and related content
On Wed 24-10-12 16:12:44, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
During orphan cleanup while doing truncate, if we fail to obtain journal
handle, the inode for which truncate was called would not be removed from
both the on-disk and in-memory orphan lists as the call to ext3_orphan_del
would not be executed.

This would have following consequences:
a) As the inode is not removed from the on-disk list, truncate would be
called again for the same inode. Each call would add the inode to the
in-memory list. This operation would continue endlessly or until truncate
is succeed.

b) If somehow, after some iterations, truncate is succeed, ext3_orphan_del
will only remove the inode from in-memory list just 1 time. This will trigger
j_assert during put super.

This patch handles both the problems. If truncate fails, first in-memory
list is cleared and than the partition is mounted as read only.
Failure to obtain journal handle during mount may suggest that journal
device is corrupted.
  Could you really trigger any of the described bugs? Because
ext3_truncate() does take care to remove inode from orphan list even if
starting of a transaction fails (see out_notrans label in ext3_truncate()).
Also spitting additional messages should be unnecessary - the error which
caused truncate to fail should have logged the error message and also taken
appropriate action depending on filesystem configuration (i.e., remount fs
read-only, panic the system, or do nothing).

								Honza
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <redacted>
---
 fs/ext3/super.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index bd60e08..798cd6f 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -1540,7 +1540,22 @@ static void ext3_orphan_cleanup (struct super_block * sb,
 			jbd_debug(2, "truncating inode %lu to %Ld bytes\n",
 				  inode->i_ino, inode->i_size);
 			ext3_truncate(inode);
-			nr_truncates++;
+			if (list_empty(&EXT3_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
+				nr_truncates++;
+			} else {
+				/* Remove inode from in-memory orphan list */
+				list_del_init(&EXT3_I(inode)->i_orphan);
+				ext3_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "Truncate failed for "
+                                        "orphan  inode = %lu. Running e2fsck"
+                                        " is recommended", inode->i_ino);
+				if (!(s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
+					ext3_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "FS would be"
+						" mounted as readonly");
+					s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
+				}
+				break;
+			}
+
 		} else {
 			printk(KERN_DEBUG
 				"%s: deleting unreferenced inode %lu\n",
-- 
1.7.11.4
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR
Message details and related content
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jan Kara [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed 24-10-12 16:12:44, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
quoted
During orphan cleanup while doing truncate, if we fail to obtain journal
handle, the inode for which truncate was called would not be removed from
both the on-disk and in-memory orphan lists as the call to ext3_orphan_del
would not be executed.

This would have following consequences:
a) As the inode is not removed from the on-disk list, truncate would be
called again for the same inode. Each call would add the inode to the
in-memory list. This operation would continue endlessly or until truncate
is succeed.

b) If somehow, after some iterations, truncate is succeed, ext3_orphan_del
will only remove the inode from in-memory list just 1 time. This will trigger
j_assert during put super.

This patch handles both the problems. If truncate fails, first in-memory
list is cleared and than the partition is mounted as read only.
Failure to obtain journal handle during mount may suggest that journal
device is corrupted.
  Could you really trigger any of the described bugs? Because
ext3_truncate() does take care to remove inode from orphan list even if
starting of a transaction fails (see out_notrans label in ext3_truncate()).
Sorry, my bad. Did'nt notice out_notrans tag.
Actually, its just ext4 which does not clear orphan list.
Please ignore this patch.

Thanks,
Ashish
Also spitting additional messages should be unnecessary - the error which
caused truncate to fail should have logged the error message and also taken
appropriate action depending on filesystem configuration (i.e., remount fs
read-only, panic the system, or do nothing).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help