linux-ext4 archive · October 2012

595 messages · showing the 100 most-recently-active threads .

• STALE5012d Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bdi: Create a flag to indicate that a backing device needs stable page writes
  2012-10-31 23:13 · 7 replies this month · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
• DORMANTno replies How Are You Doing Today.
  2012-10-31 19:58 · 0 replies this month · Leung Andrew <hidden>
• STALE5014d [PATCH] ext4: remove ext4_handle_release_buffer()
  2012-10-31 12:27 · 1 reply this month · Eric Sandeen <hidden>
• STALE5014d semi-stable page writes
  2012-10-31 11:45 · 19 replies this month · Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
• STALE5014d How to use new "native 4k sector sized" HDD with ext4
  2012-10-31 05:32 · 5 replies this month · Ashish Sangwan <hidden>
• STALE4355d [Bug 42723] New: EXT4-fs error: ext4_mb_generate_buddy
  2012-10-31 00:53 · 4 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5014d [PATCH 0/3] HWPOISON: improve error_remove_page()
  2012-10-31 00:21 · 19 replies this month · Naoya Horiguchi <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH V2] Remove VLAIS usage from JBD2 code
  2012-10-30 21:49 · 0 replies this month · Behan Webster <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [GIT PULL] more ext4 bug fixes for 3.7
  2012-10-30 19:28 · 0 replies this month · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
• STALE5004d [PATCH] Removing the use of VLAIS from the Linux Kernel
  2012-10-30 19:14 · 4 replies this month · Behan Webster <hidden>
• STALE5015d Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bdi: Create a flag to indicate that a backing device needs stable page writes
  2012-10-30 04:48 · 1 reply this month · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
• STALE5015d Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: introduce ext4_error_remove_page
  2012-10-30 00:01 · 2 replies this month · Andi Kleen <hidden>
• STALE4998d [RFC v4+ hot_track 00/19] vfs: hot data tracking
  2012-10-29 22:58 · 27 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5016d Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: introduce ext4_error_remove_page
  2012-10-29 18:55 · 3 replies this month · Andi Kleen <hidden>
• STALE5016d Transactions in JBD2 proc
  2012-10-29 18:24 · 1 reply this month · John R Nelson <hidden>
• STALE5005d [PATCH] ext4: fix overhead calculations in ext4_stats, again
  2012-10-29 17:13 · 2 replies this month · Eric Sandeen <hidden>
• STALE5016d Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-29 17:08 · 16 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5016d [PATCH] xfstests: test ext4 statfs
  2012-10-29 14:08 · 4 replies this month · Eric Sandeen <hidden>
• STALE5016d Re: [RFC v4+ hot_track 00/19] vfs: hot data tracking
  2012-10-29 12:31 · 1 reply this month · Andi Kleen <hidden>
• STALE5016d [PATCH, RFC] Ext3: Mount partition as read only if during orphan cleanup truncate fails to obtain journal handle.
  2012-10-29 11:07 · 3 replies this month · Ashish Sangwan <hidden>
• STALE5016d [PATCH] ext3: get rid of the duplicate code on ext3_fill_super
  2012-10-29 10:39 · 1 reply this month · Zhao Hongjiang <hidden>
• STALE5005d [PATCH] ext4: get rid of the duplicate code on ext4_fill_super
  2012-10-29 07:32 · 0 replies this month · Zhao Hongjiang <hidden>
• STALE5016d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-29 02:42 · 12 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5007d [RFC v4 00/15] vfs: hot data tracking
  2012-10-29 02:24 · 23 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-29 02:09 · 0 replies this month · Eric Sandeen <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-29 01:04 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5017d Fsck and large file
  2012-10-28 18:01 · 1 reply this month · Nelson, John R <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix unjournaled inode bitmap modification
  2012-10-28 13:59 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5018d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-27 18:30 · 2 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE4995d [PATCH 0/8 v3] ext4: extent status tree (step 1)
  2012-10-27 15:19 · 10 replies this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>
• STALE5018d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-27 03:12 · 2 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5018d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-27 00:23 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5018d ext4 issue after unclean shutdown and reboot
  2012-10-27 00:07 · 1 reply this month · Martin <hidden>
• STALE5018d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-26 23:15 · 3 replies this month · Martin <hidden>
• STALE5018d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-26 20:56 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-26 20:47 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5018d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-26 20:44 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5009d [PATCH] xfstests: optionally run all tests under quota
  2012-10-26 16:45 · 1 reply this month · Eric Sandeen <hidden>
• STALE5019d [PATCH] xfstests: Assume yes when test device is not partitioned
  2012-10-26 15:51 · 1 reply this month · Prasad Joshi <hidden>
• STALE5019d EXT4-fs error w/ external USB drive
  2012-10-26 14:30 · 9 replies this month · Toralf Förster <hidden>
• STALE4977d [PATCH, RFC] Ext4: Mount partition as read only if during orphan cleanup truncate fails to obtain journal handle.
  2012-10-26 11:41 · 1 reply this month · Ashish Sangwan <hidden>
• STALE5019d re: ext4: Replace BUG_ON() with ext4_error() in move_extents.c
  2012-10-26 08:13 · 1 reply this month · Dan Carpenter <hidden>
• STALE4964d [PATCH] ext4: Automatic setting of {INODE,BLOCK}_UNINIT flags
  2012-10-26 00:41 · 6 replies this month · Tomas Racek <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount) (possibly blockdev / arcmsr at fault??)
  2012-10-26 00:22 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5020d [PATCH 0/2] Patch to address the ext4 corruption problem
  2012-10-25 20:01 · 2 replies this month · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount)
  2012-10-25 17:39 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE4959d [PATCH] ext4: do not try to write superblock on journal-less readonly remount
  2012-10-25 17:38 · 2 replies this month · Michael Tokarev <hidden>
• STALE5005d [PATCH] ex4: remove unused assignment
  2012-10-25 14:20 · 0 replies this month · Alan Cox <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount)
  2012-10-25 14:16 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5020d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount)
  2012-10-25 14:12 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount)
  2012-10-25 11:06 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5020d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount)
  2012-10-25 01:11 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 23:47 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6 (when rebooting during umount)
  2012-10-24 23:42 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5020d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 21:08 · 2 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 20:46 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE4629d [Bug 44731] New: ext4 deadlock under heavy io?
  2012-10-24 20:38 · 1 reply this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 20:34 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 19:54 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5019d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 17:22 · 4 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5021d OOPS after deleting file on ext4 filesystem
  2012-10-24 13:04 · 2 replies this month · Nick Bowler <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 11:46 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-24 11:46 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5021d Re: metadata_csum set but no space in dir leaf for checksum
  2012-10-24 04:12 · 1 reply this month · Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
• STALE4974d [PATCH V7 00/23] ext4: Add inline data support
  2012-10-24 03:04 · 23 replies this month · Tao Ma <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-23 23:34 · 0 replies this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5021d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-23 23:28 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• STALE5021d Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)
  2012-10-23 23:16 · 1 reply this month · Nix <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies patch for lsattr: adds -b option similar to ls -b
  2012-10-23 22:57 · 0 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5005d [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Notify when discard is not supported
  2012-10-23 13:15 · 3 replies this month · Lukas Czerner <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [GIT PULL] ext4 bug fixes for 3.7
  2012-10-22 22:20 · 0 replies this month · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
• STALE5022d [PATCH 19/22] ext4: add support for read_iter and write_iter
  2012-10-22 15:15 · 0 replies this month · Dave Kleikamp <hidden>
• STALE5022d [PATCH 17/22] fs: add read_iter and write_iter to several file systems
  2012-10-22 15:15 · 0 replies this month · Dave Kleikamp <hidden>
• STALE5023d Shrinking ext3 partition takes long and high CPU usage
  2012-10-22 09:42 · 2 replies this month · Marcel van Beurden <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: ext4 hanlding of ext2/3 mount options
  2012-10-22 04:53 · 0 replies this month · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
• DORMANTno replies Re: The patch at 'patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/192079'
  2012-10-22 04:42 · 0 replies this month · Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
• STALE5023d [PATCH] ext4: Avoid underflow of in ext4_trim_fs()
  2012-10-22 04:37 · 3 replies this month · Lukas Czerner <hidden>
• STALE5023d [PATCH] ext4: Checksum the block bitmap properly with bigalloc enabled.
  2012-10-22 04:33 · 2 replies this month · Tao Ma <hidden>
• STALE5006d [RFC v3 00/13] vfs: hot data tracking
  2012-10-19 08:29 · 48 replies this month · <hidden>
• STALE5026d Re: Local DoS through write heavy I/O on CFQ & Deadline
  2012-10-18 22:24 · 2 replies this month · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] e4defrag: Fix segfault when /etc/mtab is empty
  2012-10-18 06:36 · 0 replies this month · Ashish Sangwan <hidden>
• STALE5027d [PATCH] e4defrag: Add option -m mtab to e4defrag
  2012-10-18 03:09 · 4 replies this month · Ashish Sangwan <hidden>
• STALE5027d A question about the naming of e2fsprogs/tests
  2012-10-18 00:19 · 1 reply this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>
• STALE5027d [Bug 48751] New: ext3: ctime changes with no reason in 30 seconds after a file change
  2012-10-17 22:53 · 6 replies this month · <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies Re: metadata_csum set but no space in dir leaf for checksum
  2012-10-17 21:21 · 0 replies this month · Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
• STALE5028d Re: [PATCH 01/10] ext4: balloc: Fixed coding style issue
  2012-10-17 16:52 · 1 reply this month · Lukáš Czerner <hidden>
• DORMANTno replies [PATCH] ext4: prevent kernel panic in case of uninitialized jinode
  2012-10-17 15:54 · 0 replies this month · Volodymyr Mieshkov <hidden>
• STALE5028d [PATCH 01/10] ext4: balloc: Fixed coding style issue
  2012-10-17 12:13 · 11 replies this month · Adil Mujeeb <hidden>
• STALE5005d REVIEWED: 1 (0M) [PATCH 1/2 v2] ext4: print 'flags' in ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents
  2012-10-16 12:44 · 2 replies this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>
• STALE5029d [PATCH 1/2] ext4: print 'flags' in trace_ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents
  2012-10-16 10:45 · 4 replies this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>
• STALE5005d [PATCH] ext4: missing trace_ext4_ext_map_blocks_exit after calling ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents
  2012-10-16 07:20 · 0 replies this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>
• STALE5005d [PATCH 1/2] Use 'inode' variable that is already dereferenced
  2012-10-16 02:26 · 5 replies this month · Anatol Pomozov <hidden>
• STALE5006d [Bug 45741] New: ext4 scans all disk when calling fallocate after mount on 99% full volume.
  2012-10-15 21:25 · 1 reply this month · <hidden>
• STALE5029d [Bug 27912] New: Set 'err' in ext4_init_fs() if kset_create_and_add() fails
  2012-10-15 21:24 · 1 reply this month · <hidden>
• STALE5029d [Bug 47731] New: Null pointer dereference at strchr
  2012-10-15 21:18 · 1 reply this month · <hidden>
• STALE5030d [PATCH] ext4: fix undefined bit shift result in ext4_fill_flex_info
  2012-10-15 17:00 · 2 replies this month · Lukas Czerner <hidden>
• STALE5030d [Bug 47611] New: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1
  2012-10-15 08:59 · 1 reply this month · <hidden>
• STALE5030d [PATCH 00/21 v5] e2fsprogs: make e2fsprogs support inline data
  2012-10-14 23:23 · 2 replies this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>
• STALE5031d metadata_csum set but no space in dir leaf for checksum
  2012-10-14 17:40 · 4 replies this month · George Spelvin <hidden>
• STALE5031d Re: A warning from 3.6+ with bigalloc and delalloc when running xfstest
  2012-10-14 14:41 · 5 replies this month · Zheng Liu <hidden>