[PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
[PATCH v1 1/9] ext4: do not mark superblock as dirty unnecessarily · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] ext4: do not mark superblock as dirty unnecessarily · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
[PATCH v1 2/9] ext4: write superblock only once on unmount · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] ext4: write superblock only once on unmount · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
[PATCH v1 3/9] ext4: remove useless s_dirt assignment · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH v1 3/9] ext4: remove useless s_dirt assignment · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
[PATCH v1 4/9] mm: export dirty_writeback_interval · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
[PATCH v1 5/9] VFS: remove unused superblock helpers · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
[PATCH v1 6/9] ext4: introduce __ext4_mark_super_dirty · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
[PATCH v1 7/9] ext4: stop using VFS for dirty superblock management · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH v1 7/9] ext4: stop using VFS for dirty superblock management · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-21
[PATCH v1 8/9] ext4: small cleanup in ext4_commit_super · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH v1 8/9] ext4: small cleanup in ext4_commit_super · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
[PATCH v1 9/9] ext4: introduce own superblock dirty flag · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-27
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-27
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-28
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-28
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-30
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-30
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-30
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-03-31
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-04-02
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-31
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> · 2012-03-22
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> · 2012-03-23
Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4 · Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> · 2012-03-23

Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4

From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-04-02 13:46:58
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:49 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:

quoted

Well, I ran vanilla the tests in vanilla 3.3 overnight, they were fine.
But may be I was lucky. I'll try to run the tests with vanilla kernel
some more. I mean, it would make more sense to report something against
vanilla 3.3, not a patched 3.3.

  That's true. Frankly I think you were lucky with hitting the bug with
patched kernel rather than not hitting it with vanilla :). What test did
you run exactly?

I've sent a separate report (Subject: 3.3 oops). The oops there is a bit
different comparing to this one, though. For this oops I used the same
kvm setup.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachments

signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 836 bytes

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help