Thread (36 messages) flat view 36 messages, 3 authors, 2012-04-02

Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] do not use s_dirt in ext4

From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-03-22 13:59:32
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 14:42 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
quoted
But AFAIKC, the whole '__ext4_handle_dirty_super()' also falls-back to
marking the superblock as dirty if the file-system has no journal for
some reasons, right?
  Yes. And I wrote that if you do sync_buffer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh) instead
of marking superblock dirty, it would be fine.
OK, sorry for not reading carefully, I will take a look at this and all
the places where we use 's_dirt' and try to think how to just eliminate
them. But since I have 0 experience with ext4, I'll probably need some
help, but let's see.

Thanks for reviewing and the feed-back!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help