Re: [PATCH 66/73] ext2: Split ext2_add_entry() from ext2_add_link() [ver #2]
From: Andreas Dilger <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-27 20:45:50
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On 2012-02-27, at 12:09 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 08:30:34PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:quoted
quoted
I'd suggest folding this in with the following patch (67/73). It's not clear from this patch why renaming ext2_add_link to ext2_add_entry() makes sense and then adding a new ext2_add_link() which calls ext_add_entry(). It doesn't seem to clarify much....Also, why is this being done in ext2, when it should only be done in ext4?I believe Val used ext2 as a proof-of-concept, because the codebase was stable (and Union Mounts has been in the oven a loooong time, so that was probably a good choice). I agree that if union mounts is finally going to make it upstream, this would be a good time to support implemented for ext4, and to get the support into e2fsprogs. BTW, one thing that I think would be a good thing to do while we're making this change is to mask off the low 4 bits when looking at the filetype field so eventually we can use the high 4 bits for some future extension.
Umm, we already DO use the high 4 bits for a future extension in the EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DIRDATA feature. The bare minimum for this is extracted from a larger patch that allows storing extra data in the dirent. We use it to store a filesystem-wide 128-bit identifier into the dirent, and it could also be used to store the high 32 bits of the inode number in a compatible way. I haven't pushed this upstream as I don't think anyone else is interested in this yet, but masking off the file type is definitely simple and could be accepted upstream. Index: linux-stage/fs/ext4/ext4.h ===================================================================
--- linux-stage.orig/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ linux-stage/fs/ext4/ext4.h@@ -1262,6 +1265,24 @@ struct ext4_dir_entry_2 { #define EXT4_FT_SYMLINK 7 #define EXT4_FT_MAX 8 +#define EXT4_FT_MASK 0xf + +#if EXT4_FT_MAX > EXT4_FT_MASK +#error "conflicting EXT4_FT_MAX and EXT4_FT_MASK" +#endif + +/* + * d_type has 4 unused bits, so it can hold four types data. these different + * type of data (e.g. lustre file ID, high 32 bits of 64-bit inode number) + * can be stored, in flag order, after file-name in ext4 dirent. +*/ +/* + * This flag is added to d_type if ext4 dirent has extra data after filename. + * This data length is variable and length is stored in first byte of data. + * Data starts after filename NUL byte. This is used by Lustre FS. + */ +#define EXT4_DIRENT_LUFID 0x10 /* * EXT4_DIR_PAD defines the directory entries boundaries
Index: linux-stage/fs/ext4/dir.c ===================================================================
--- linux-stage.orig/fs/ext4/dir.c
+++ linux-stage/fs/ext4/dir.c@@ -53,11 +53,14 @@ const struct file_operations ext4_dir_op static unsigned char get_dtype(struct super_block *sb, int filetype) { + int fl_index = filetype & EXT4_FT_MASK; + if (!EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE) || - (filetype >= EXT4_FT_MAX)) + (fl_index >= EXT4_FT_MAX)) return DT_UNKNOWN; - return (ext4_filetype_table[filetype]); + return ext4_filetype_table[fl_index]); + }
Cheers, Andreas