On 02/21/2012 07:55 AM, Xi Wang wrote:

On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:

quoted

Hm this raises a few questions I think.

On the one hand, making sure the kmalloc arg doesn't overflow here is
certainly a good thing and probably the right thing to do in the short term.

So I guess:

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <redacted>

for that, to close the hole.

Another possibility is to wait for knalloc/kmalloc_array in the -mm
tree, which is basically the non-zeroing version of kcalloc that
performs overflow checking.

quoted

Doesn't this also mean that a valid s_log_groups_per_flex (i.e. 31)
will fail in this resize code?  That would be an unexpected outcome.
2^31 groups per flex is a little crazy, but still technically valid
according to the limits in the code.

Or we could limit s_log_groups_per_flex/groups_per_flex to a
reasonable upper bound in ext4_fill_flex_info(), right?

Depends on the "flex_bg" design intent, I guess.

I don't know if the 2^31 was an intended design limit, or just a
mathematical limit that based on container sizes etc...

I'd have to look at the resize code more carefully but I can't imagine
that it's imperative to allocate this stuff all at once.

-Eric

- xi