Re: mdadm software raid + ext4, capped at ~350MiB/s limitation/bug?
From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2010-02-28 15:03:08
Also in:
linux-raid, lkml
From: Justin Piszcz <hidden>
Date: 2010-02-28 15:03:08
Also in:
linux-raid, lkml
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Justin Piszcz [off-list ref] wrote:
[ .. ]
How did you format the ext3 and ext4 filesystems? Did you use mkfs.ext[34] -E stride and stripe-width accordingly? AFAIK even older versions of mkfs.xfs will probe for this info but older mkfs.ext[34] won't (though new versions of mkfs.ext[34] will, using the Linux "topology" info).
Yes and it did not make any difference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/27/77 Incase anyone else wants to try too, you can calculate by hand, or if you are in a hurry, I found this useful: http://busybox.net/~aldot/mkfs_stride.html I believe there is something fundamentally wrong with ext4 when performing large sequential I/O when writing, esp. after Ted's comments. Justin.