Re: [PATCH 6/6] ext4: tighten restrictions on inode flags
From: Duane Griffin <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-11 11:50:29
Also in:
lkml
From: Duane Griffin <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-11 11:50:29
Also in:
lkml
2008/6/11 Aneesh Kumar K.V [off-list ref]:
quoted
+/* Mask out flags that are inappropriate for the given type of inode. */ +static inline __le32 ext4_mask_flags(__le16 mode, __le32 flags) +{ + if (S_ISDIR(mode)) + return flags; + else if (S_ISREG(mode)) + return flags & ~EXT4_REG_FLMASK; + else + return flags & ~EXT4_OTHER_FLMASK; +} +why are the arguments __le32 ? They should be in host order. static inline __u32 ext4_mask_flags(umode_t mode, __u32 flags)
Whoops, I was matching the fields in ex4_inode, but I should have been looking at ext4_inode_info. Shouldn't sparse have complained about that? Thanks, Duane. -- "I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan