Re: [PATCH 10/14] efi: Make checkpatch complain less about efi.h GUID additions
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-03 10:50:46
Also in:
lkml
* Matt Fleming [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 03 Feb, at 11:33:35AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:quoted
* Matt Fleming [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Peter Jones <redacted> This reformats the GUID definitions in include/linux/efi.h so that if you add another one with the same style, checkpatch won't complain about it. Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <redacted> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <redacted> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> --- include/linux/efi.h | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h index 09f1559e7525..f468f7c53236 100644 --- a/include/linux/efi.h +++ b/include/linux/efi.h@@ -535,67 +535,88 @@ void efi_native_runtime_setup(void); * EFI Configuration Table and GUID definitions */ #define NULL_GUID \ - EFI_GUID( 0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 ) + EFI_GUID(0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, \ + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00) #define MPS_TABLE_GUID \ - EFI_GUID( 0xeb9d2d2f, 0x2d88, 0x11d3, 0x9a, 0x16, 0x0, 0x90, 0x27, 0x3f, 0xc1, 0x4d ) + EFI_GUID(0xeb9d2d2f, 0x2d88, 0x11d3, \ + 0x9a, 0x16, 0x00, 0x90, 0x27, 0x3f, 0xc1, 0x4d)So I really think this is a step backwards. Checkpatch should be fixed/enhanced to allow targeted exemption. Something like: #define CHECKPATCH_IGNORE ... #undef CHECKPATCH_IGNORE ... which checkpatch would parse and interpret accordingly.Irrespective of which tool suggested this change, I think this patch is an improvement because the GUIDs now match the format from the UEFI spec, making checking for typos that much easier (yes, I've really had to do that in the past).
Hm, so the GUIDs are line-broken in the same fashion in the spec, after the third parameter? That's a strong reason indeed - and then the changelog and title should say that: 're-format GUID tables to follow the format of the UEFI spec'. That it also pacifies checkpatch is a side effect. Thanks, Ingo