Re: [PATCH V7 07/19] dax: Add fs_dax_get() func to prepare dax for fs-dax usage
From: John Groves <John@groves.net>
Date: 2026-02-26 23:21:03
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-fsdevel, lkml, nvdimm
On 26/02/19 09:07AM, Dave Jiang wrote:
On 1/18/26 3:32 PM, John Groves wrote:quoted
From: John Groves <john@groves.net> The fs_dax_get() function should be called by fs-dax file systems after opening a fsdev dax device. This adds holder_operations, which provides a memory failure callback path and effects exclusivity between callers of fs_dax_get(). fs_dax_get() is specific to fsdev_dax, so it checks the driver type (which required touching bus.[ch]). fs_dax_get() fails if fsdev_dax is not bound to the memory. This function serves the same role as fs_dax_get_by_bdev(), which dax file systems call after opening the pmem block device. This can't be located in fsdev.c because struct dax_device is opaque there. This will be called by fs/fuse/famfs.c in a subsequent commit. Signed-off-by: John Groves <john@groves.net> --- drivers/dax/bus.c | 2 -- drivers/dax/bus.h | 2 ++ drivers/dax/super.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/dax.h | 20 ++++++++++------ 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c index e79daf825b52..01402d5103ef 100644 --- a/drivers/dax/bus.c +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ static int dax_bus_uevent(const struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env) return add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=" DAX_DEVICE_MODALIAS_FMT, 0); } -#define to_dax_drv(__drv) container_of_const(__drv, struct dax_device_driver, drv) - static struct dax_id *__dax_match_id(const struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv, const char *dev_name) {diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.h b/drivers/dax/bus.h index 880bdf7e72d7..dc6f112ac4a4 100644 --- a/drivers/dax/bus.h +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.h@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ struct dax_device_driver { void (*remove)(struct dev_dax *dev); }; +#define to_dax_drv(__drv) container_of_const(__drv, struct dax_device_driver, drv) + int __dax_driver_register(struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv, struct module *module, const char *mod_name); #define dax_driver_register(driver) \diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c index ba0b4cd18a77..00c330ef437c 100644 --- a/drivers/dax/super.c +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/cacheinfo.h> #include "dax-private.h" +#include "bus.h" /** * struct dax_device - anchor object for dax services@@ -111,6 +112,10 @@ struct dax_device *fs_dax_get_by_bdev(struct block_device *bdev, u64 *start_off, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_dax_get_by_bdev); +#endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK && CONFIG_FS_DAX */ + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX) + void fs_put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void *holder) { if (dax_dev && holder &&@@ -119,7 +124,58 @@ void fs_put_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void *holder) put_dax(dax_dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fs_put_dax); -#endif /* CONFIG_BLOCK && CONFIG_FS_DAX */ + +/** + * fs_dax_get() - get ownership of a devdax via holder/holder_ops + * + * fs-dax file systems call this function to prepare to use a devdax device for + * fsdax. This is like fs_dax_get_by_bdev(), but the caller already has struct + * dev_dax (and there is no bdev). The holder makes this exclusive. + * + * @dax_dev: dev to be prepared for fs-dax usage + * @holder: filesystem or mapped device inside the dax_device + * @hops: operations for the inner holder + * + * Returns: 0 on success, <0 on failure + */ +int fs_dax_get(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void *holder, + const struct dax_holder_operations *hops) +{ + struct dev_dax *dev_dax; + struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv; + int id; + + id = dax_read_lock(); + if (!dax_dev || !dax_alive(dax_dev) || !igrab(&dax_dev->inode)) { + dax_read_unlock(id); + return -ENODEV; + } + dax_read_unlock(id); + + /* Verify the device is bound to fsdev_dax driver */ + dev_dax = dax_get_private(dax_dev); + if (!dev_dax || !dev_dax->dev.driver) {Don't you need to hold the dev_dax->dev device lock in order to check the driver? DJ
Derp. Thanks for catching that Dave! I believe it's fixed for v8, which is probably coming early next week. John [snip]