Thread (80 messages) 80 messages, 11 authors, 2026-04-28

Re: [PATCH V7 05/19] dax: Add dax_operations for use by fs-dax on fsdev dax

From: John Groves <John@groves.net>
Date: 2026-02-18 00:50:14
Also in: linux-cxl, linux-fsdevel, lkml, nvdimm

On 26/02/14 10:10AM, Ira Weiny wrote:
John Groves wrote:
quoted
From: John Groves <John@Groves.net>

fsdev: Add dax_operations for use by famfs

- These methods are based on pmem_dax_ops from drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
- fsdev_dax_direct_access() returns the hpa, pfn and kva. The kva was
  newly stored as dev_dax->virt_addr by dev_dax_probe().
- The hpa/pfn are used for mmap (dax_iomap_fault()), and the kva is used
  for read/write (dax_iomap_rw())
I thought this driver did not support mmap?
If a daxdev /dev/dax0.0 is in 'famfs' mode (bound to drivers/dax/fsdev.c),
and you open it and try to mmap - you can't - that's true.

This stuff is necessary to support mmap/read/write on famfs files.
quoted
- fsdev_dax_recovery_write() and dev_dax_zero_page_range() have not been
  tested yet. I'm looking for suggestions as to how to test those.
- dax-private.h: add dev_dax->cached_size, which fsdev needs to
  remember. The dev_dax size cannot change while a driver is bound
  (dev_dax_resize returns -EBUSY if dev->driver is set). Caching the size
  at probe time allows fsdev's direct_access path can use it without
  acquiring dax_dev_rwsem (which isn't exported anyway).
None of the above explains exactly why this code is needed.  Rather it
just explains what it does.

I'm not 100% clear on why this is needed in the driver and why this is not
a layering violation which is going to bite us later?
I'll update the description to make it clear.

But basically: this is the stuff that xfs uses in /dev/pmem when it's in
fs-dax mode, to to resolve read/write to a memcpy variant, and to handle
faults via dax_iomap_fault() (which lets famfs resolve (file, offset) to
(daxdev, offset), and then dax finishes the job by resolving to PFN (or HPA -
whatever).

So for famfs to support file read/write/mmap on a devdax backing device,
this is the necessary glue.

Next patch version (v8) will make this more clear.

Thanks Ira!
John

[snip]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help