Re: [PATCH 14/15] drm/amd: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() --> DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN()
From: Fernando Ramos <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-17 23:17:12
Also in:
amd-gfx, dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-arm-msm, linux-renesas-soc, linux-tegra, lkml, nouveau
quoted
+ struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx; int r; + int ret;Relocate ret with r please
Done!
quoted
- drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);You should check ret here
Done!
quoted
int r; + int ret;Relocate ret with r
Done!
quoted
- drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret); return 0;Return ret
Done!
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c index 9b1fc54555ee..5196c1d26f87 100644@@ -2661,13 +2657,18 @@ static void handle_hpd_irq(void *param) amdgpu_dm_update_connector_after_detect(aconnector); - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev); - dm_restore_drm_connector_state(dev, connector); - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); - - if (aconnector->base.force == DRM_FORCE_UNSPECIFIED) - drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(dev); + } else { + goto out; } + + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN(dev, ctx, 0, ret); + dm_restore_drm_connector_state(dev, connector); + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);Check ret here please
This function ("handle_hpd_irq") returns void. What would the appropriate way of
checking the error be?
quoted
@@ -2841,14 +2838,17 @@ static void handle_hpd_rx_irq(void *param) amdgpu_dm_update_connector_after_detect(aconnector); + } else { + goto finish;You used 'out' above and 'finish' here. It would be nice to be consistent with naming, I see 'out' a lot more than 'finish', so my vote would be to change this label to 'out'.
I originally used "out", but turns out there is already an "out" label in this
function :)
I then searched for other "go to end" labels and found "finish" being used in
this same file.
But I can rename it to somehitng else ("out2" maybe?) to make it less confusing.
quoted
+ } - drm_modeset_lock_all(dev); - dm_restore_drm_connector_state(dev, connector); - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev); + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN(dev, ctx, 0, ret); + dm_restore_drm_connector_state(dev, connector); + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);Check ret here?
This is another irq-like function returning void. What can we do here after having checked the error?
quoted
+#include <drm/drm_drv.h>Top-level headers generally come above the driver headers. Also, now that I think about this a bit more, all of the new includes in this set should probably be for 'drm_modeset_lock.h' instead of 'drm_drv.h'.
Ok. Let me try that.
quoted
@@ -1259,13 +1257,16 @@ static ssize_t trigger_hotplug(struct file *f, const char __user *buf, + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN(dev, ctx, 0, ret); + dm_restore_drm_connector_state(dev, connector); + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);Check ret here?
This is a .write file_operations function expected to return a "size". Is it ok for it to return an error? I guess so, right?